Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of Composite Resin Restaurations Posterior Teeth

Clinical Behavior of Composite Resin Restauarations of Oclusal Cavities in Posterior Teeth

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-6fsy6z
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-03-05
Start date
2010-08-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries. Inlays

Interventions

Two hundred and eighty occlusal cavity restorations were performed in 70 patients (4 restorations in each patient) of the male and female genders at 17 and 50 years of age.The restorations were divide
G2 (Rok / SDI)
G3 Filtek ™ P90 / 3M ESPE)
G4 (Evolux / Dentsply), performed by two operators pre-calibrated and evaluated directly for color reproduction, cavosurface margin discoloration, caries incidence, contour and marginal integrity, aft
Other

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Lead Sponsor
Uninovafapi
Collaborator
Centro Integrado de Saúde Amaury de Medeiros (CISAM)
Collaborator
Ufpi (Universidade Federal do Piauí
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients should be 17 years of age or older, have a need for restorative treatment on occlusal surfaces of at least four posterior teeth, and dental elements that antagonize restorations should be healthy or satisfactorily restored.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with dental elements antagonistic to non-healthy restorations were excluded; not satisfactorily restored; restored with ceramic material and missing or removable / movable prosthetic parts holders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
A clinical performance of restorative materials was evaluated according to the Parameters: Color reproduction, cavo-superficial margin discoloration, Incidence of caries, Contour or loss of substance or wear, and Marginal integrity. Satisfactory restorations received the scores A (ideal) and B (acceptable). Scores C and D were attributed to unsatisfactory restorations, according to the modified Cvar and Ryge method.;Of the total restorations evaluated, 85.8% received A score (ideal) for color reproduction; 91.4% for margin discoloration; 100% for incidence of caries; 87.7% for contour and 99.3% for marginal integrity. Postoperative sensitivity was observed in 8.2% (twenty-two) patients in the first week and in 1.5% (two patients) after 1 month.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactBrunno;Bruno Veras;Veras

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco;Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

brunnomendonca@hotmail.com;brunnomendonca@hotmail.com55-81-998080019;055(81)998080019

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)