Toothache
Conditions
Interventions
For the present two-arm randomized clinical trial (articaine 4% and articaine 2% alkalized) the sample will be composed of 42 students from the second to the fifth year of graduation and post-graduati
Sponsors
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba- Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba- Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Healthy individuals; Age 18 years or older; Previous experience of local anesthesia (have already taken it on another occasion); No history of complications resulting from local anesthesia; Lower molars on both sides healthy (absence of restorations); Responsible for the electrical stimulus “Pulp Tester”.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women; lactating women; with systemic involvement that would contraindicate anesthesia; History of allergic reaction to any component of the anesthetic solutions used; Presence of an inflammatory condition in the region.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The anesthetic efficacy of alkalized 2% articaine solution is expected to be equal to or greater than commercial 4% articaine solution. Through the esthesiometer to assess latency and duration of soft tissue anesthesia, pulp tester to assess latency and duration of pulp anesthesia and through the visual analogue scale to compare pain and burning sensation during the injection of both solutions. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| We do not expect secondary outcomes | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactSidney Raimundo
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba- Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Outcome results
None listed