Skip to content

Study of effects of Laser on microorganisms and on success of canal treatment

Study of effects of Laser on microorganisms and on success of canal treatment

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-6d88tdq
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-05-21
Start date
2014-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

chronic apical periodontitis

Interventions

Control group: 16 patients went through conventional endodontic treatment and intracanal medication at the first appointment. TF group: 16 patients received conventional endodontic treatment and after
E06.397.778
E02.186.500

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Instituto de microbiologia Paulo de Góes
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Faculdade de Odontologia
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: First and second mandibular molars; diagnosis of necrosis with periapical lesion; completely closed apices; in need of endodontic treatment; patient between 18 and 80 years old; patients with painful symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who used antibiotics, immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory drugs in the last three months; teeth with root fractures, previous endodontic treatment, periodontal pocket, anatomical complexities, coronary fracture or very extensive cavities; pregnant and lactating patients; patients with systemic and oral cavity diseases that could influence the natural course or treatment of the disease; patients with systemic conditions that need prophylactic antibiotic coverage; patients who did not agree to participate or sign the IC.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The clinical and radiographic evolution evaluation, verified by the periapical index method (scoring system to assess periapical bone repair), high rates of periapical healing (97%) were observed in both therapeutic groups in the 12-month follow-up.;In the evaluation of clinical and radiographic evolution, the comparison between the control group and the group using photodynamic therapy (TF group), verified by the periapical index method (scoring system to assess periapical bone repair), no additional benefit was observed over conventional therapy alone in promoting periapical healing. At 12 months, the frequency of the lowest scores (1 and 2) in the control group was 93.3% and in the TF group, 100%.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactRachel de Miranda
miranda.rachel@gmail.com+55 021 988922491

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)