Subacromial impingement syndrome
Conditions
Interventions
Participants will be assigned to an alphanumeric code list and randomized (1:1 ratio) using SPSS v27 to receive an experimental or control group. The experimental group, will have 47 participants will
the exercises should not reproduce pain, only mild to moderate pain levels (<4/10 in EVA) are accepted after the session, but must have stopped within 12 hours and a maximum of 4 exercises per session
shoulder abduction movements in the frontal plane, shoulder retraction, elevation of the shoulder, retraction of the cervical spine, passive stretching of the upper trapezius and pectoralis major and
E02.779.474
G11.427.410.698.277
Sponsors
Universidad de las Americas
Universidad de las Americas
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Subjects with more than 18 years of age derived from the Trauma Service of Adults with clinical diagnosis and image of SPSA type II with a poor initial response of conservative treatment. Volunteers who Accept and sign informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: subjects presenting pathologies of cervical origin (cervicobrachialgia, herniated disc, etc.); other pathologies of the joint complex of the shoulder (proximal humerus fracture, calcific tendinitis, adhesive capsulitis, glenohumeral instability, partial or total rupture of the rotator cuff, etc.) ; who also present antecedents of previous surgery of the affected shoulder and who have previously been infiltrated with corticosteroids in the affected shoulder (6 months).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected result 1- It is expected to find a improve in shoulder function assessed through the Constant-Murley in the participants of the specific exercise program compared to that of home exercises The function will be evaluated using the Constant-Murley questionnaire, which is one of the most widely used and recommended instruments for assessing shoulder function. taking into account the study of Henseler et al, we established as a clinically important minimum difference a difference of at least 17 points for the group treated with the specific exercise program. To detect this difference between both treatments, with a value of = 0.05 (probability of committing a type I error) and a statistical power of 90%, a minimum of 39 patients per group is required. We considered adjusting the sample size for possible losses or dropouts, increasing the number of patients recruited by 20%, with 47 patients remaining in each group. According to this, the authors of the present study have proposed as an experimental hypothesis that there is an increase of at least 17 points in the Constant-Murley questionnaire in the group treated with a specific exercise program compared to that of home exercises. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected result 2- It is expected to find a improve in upper limb function assessed through the Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (dash) questionnaire in the participants of the specific exercise program compared to that of home exercises;Expected result 3- It is expected to find a decrease in pain intensity assessed through the visual analogue scale (VAS) in the participants of the specific exercise program compared to that of general exercises | — |
Countries
Chile
Contacts
Public ContactFelipe Araya Quintanilla
Universidad de las Americas
Outcome results
None listed