Skip to content

Evaluation of two types of implants installed in the jaw

A comparative study of marginal bone variation around Titanium-13Zirconium and versus Titanium Grade IV.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-6c2k3m
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2012-04-16
Start date
2011-05-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with partially edentulous jaw that need to be restored with single crowns

Interventions

12 SLActive® Implants (Control Group) and 12 Roxolid® Implants (Test Group)(Straumann® Dental Implant System, Basel, Switzerland), both with 3.3 diameter and platform 4.8 mm were installed in the pos
other
E06.892

Sponsors

Universidade de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Universidade de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: To sign voluntary informed consent for using his/her data; At least 18 years-old; Posterior edentulous areas that needed at least 2 implants in the maxilla, or 2 implants in the mandible To have a posterior area to receive one narrow implant diameter at least 8 weeks to implant installation; 5 mm of ridge width and 8 mm of lengh; These implants had to receive one single-crown rehabilitation and to have a antagonist tooth 1 year of follow up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of sistemic problems, ex. diabetes Use of any drug that could affect bone metabolism (biphosphonates); Tobacco abuse (> 10 cigarettes/day); Presence of immunocompromising conditions (HIV-positive, AIDS, or under therapy with immunosuppressive drugs); Disability that interferes with the ability of a suitable cleaning; History of radiotherapy of the head/neck region . Pregnancy or lactating; Condition or circumstance that may lead patients to abandon the study; Presence of untreated periodontitis; Soft and/or hard tissues alterations; Previous bone augmentation procedure in the same place to fixture installation; Presence of parafunctional habits;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of the bone level between TiZr and Ti after 1 year of clinical, radiogrphically and tomographically follow up.It is expected that after the follow up the Titanium-Zirconium implants provide a higher success rate

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Reduced in the failure of the prosthesis in Titanium Zirconium implants after 1 year of follow up through the clinical analysis of fractures in prosthetic components and / or remission of the screws.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactLívia Tolentino

Universidade de São Paulo

liviatolentino85@gmail.com55-11 3091-7840

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)