Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Will be included in the study individuals aged between 65 and 79 years; have a clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association - ADA (GROSS et al., 2002); presenting complaints of altered body balance, defined as imbalance and / or dizziness (BITTAR, BOTTINO, BENTO, 2003); have a higher risk of falls by the Dynamic Gait Index with a score of 19 or less (SHUMWAY-COOK, WOOLACOTT, 1995); do not present cognitive impairment according to education (BRUCKI et al., 2003); have mild or moderate peripheral neuropathy assessed by the Neuropathic Symptom Score - ESN (MOREIRA et al., 2005); have good visual acuity assessed by the Snellen Table (JANUZZI et al., 2014); are not undergoing some kind of body balance rehabilitation or performed it up to six months before the survey.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: (1) Individuals undergoing balance rehabilitation currently or in the past six months; (2) clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| At least 5% greater improvement in postural balance is expected in the virtual reality treated group than in the kinesiotherapy group, all measured by the Mini - The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini BESTest). For this, the 2x2 repeated measures ANOVA will be used considering as an intergroup factor, the intervention and control groups; and the intragroups, the two evaluations to be performed. The effect size (F) and 95% confidence interval (CI) will be displayed and the significance level of 5% (p<0,05) will be adopted. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary outcome 1 is expected to correlate DM2 comorbidities with the clinical characteristics of the elderly. To correlate DM2 comorbidities (categories) with clinical characteristics (categories and quantitative), the chi-square test or Pearson or Spearman correlations (depending on the normality of the data) will be used and statistical significance is sought (p<0,05).;Secondary outcome 2 is expected to improve cognition by at least 1% by Mini Mental State Examination after each protocol application and follow-up. For this, the paired T test or Wilcoxon test will be used, depending on the normality of the data. Statistical significance is expected (p<0,05).;Secondary outcome 3 is expected to have at least a 1% improvement in functional mobility measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery after application of each protocol and follow-up. For this, the paired T test or Wilcoxon test will be used, depending on the normality of the data. Statistical significance is expected (p<0,05).;Secondary outcome 4 is expected to have at least a 1% improvement in depressive symptoms as measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) after application of each protocol and follow-up. For this, the paired T test or Wilcoxon test will be used, depending on the normality of the data. Statistical significance is expected (p<0,05). | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte