Skip to content

Comparison of the effect of Suprascapular Nerve Block associated with Physiotherapy and Physiotherapy alone in the treatment of frozen shoulder

Comparison of the effectiveness of Suprascapular nerve block associated with Physical therapy and Physical therapy alone in the treatment of Primary rigid shoulder

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-67xwg78
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-01-02
Start date
2021-07-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adhesive capsulitis in shoulder

Interventions

Patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC) were included in the study, characterized as: painful shoulder of spontaneous onset, accompanied by progressive limitation of glenohumeral movement in all direct
not subjected to previous treatment
and confirmation by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), characterized by T2 hypersignal of the inferior joint capsule 4 mm, decreased filling of the axillary recess and edema in the rotator interval. P
and the second group (control) was formed by 50 patients who received only physical therapy as treatment (PT). Physiotherapy was performed by a group directly linked to the outpatient clinic where the
E02.779

Sponsors

Clínica de Fraturas
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
20 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with a painful shoulder of spontaneous onset; accompanied by progressive limitation of glenohumeral movement in all directions; including at least 50% reduction in external rotation; not subjected to previous treatment; and confirmation by magnetic resonance imaging characterized by hypersignal of the inferior joint capsule greater than 4 mm; decreased filling of the axillary recess and edema in the rotator interval; age between 20 and 60 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Secondary rigid shoulder; patients already treated for rigid shoulder prior to the study; absence of magnetic resonance to confirm the diagnosis; patients with type I diabetes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate through visual analogue pain scale, UCLA score and measurement of range of motion with digital goniometry (iHandy Level), before treatment and at 2, 4 and 6 months after.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactJoão de Medeiros Filho

Clínica de Fraturas

jfelip_ortopedia@uol.com.br+55 (84) 999818791

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)