Skip to content

Effect of Magnetic Stimulation on Body Movement

Influence of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on motor evoked potentials

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-67m72sm
Enrollment
150
Registered
2026-04-13
Start date
2026-05-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemorrhagic Stroke Nervous System Diseases

Interventions

This is a randomized controlled experimental clinical trial with five arms including 150 participants, comprising 75 healthy individuals and 75 patients with chronic stroke, allocated into five parall

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Alfenas
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Alfenas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
30 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Individuals of both sexes; aged between 30 and 75 years; diagnosis of left ischemic stroke confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging; between 3 weeks and 1 year post stroke; right upper limb motor preference assessed by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory translated and validated into Portuguese with inclusion of only right handed participants with right hemiparesis and preserved right handgrip function; minimum score of 27 points in the upper limb domain of the Fugl Meyer scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Left sided motor preference assessed by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory; orthopedic disorders; contraindications to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation including personal or first degree family history of epilepsy or seizures presence of metallic implants or active electronic devices in the head or neck presence of cardiac pacemaker or implanted defibrillator; inability to understand written and spoken Portuguese; pain during task execution; difficulty performing handgrip or index finger flexion movements; failure to reach at least 70 percent of maximal voluntary isometric contraction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome will be the change in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, measured peak-to-peak in the first dorsal interosseous muscle, assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation before and after the intervention, as an indicator of corticospinal excitability. Additional primary outcomes will include the MEP-based motor overflow index (calculated as the percentage change between resting and task conditions) and the force irradiation index obtained through handgrip dynamometry during standardized isometric contractions. These outcomes will be used to estimate the effect of the intervention on corticospinal excitability and motor control.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes will include motor evoked potential latency and duration, measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation; handgrip strength (expressed as a percentage of maximal voluntary isometric contraction) obtained by dynamometry; and comparisons of responses between groups (healthy individuals versus patients with stroke) and across different stimulation sites (primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, and anterior cingulate cortex). Additionally, the influence of time (pre- versus post-intervention) and laterality on neurophysiological and mechanical outcomes will be evaluated.

Countries

BR

Contacts

Public ContactMarcelo Silva

Universidade Federal de Alfenas

marcelo.lourenco@unifal-mg.edu.br+55 35 3701-1926

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026