Skip to content

Pain education and exercise program supported by cell phone for older adults with low back pain

Pain education and exercise program supported by mobile technology for older adults with chronic low back pain at primary care: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-653xcn
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-09-17
Start date
2020-09-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

chronic low back pain

Interventions

Intervention group (n=20): The intervention group will consist of a multifaceted weekly group training program for eight weeks. The intervention protocol includes the following components: pain educat
Other
G11.427.410.698.277
I02.233.332

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Ceará
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Ceará
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
60 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with low back pain as their primary musculoskeletal complaint (pain between the 12th thoracic vertebra to the gluteal fold) for three or more months; with or without irradiation of symptoms to lower limbs; aged 60 and over; both sexes; residents of Regional III in the city of Fortaleza CE; cell phone owners, and score greater than 3 points on START Back Screening Tool (SBST)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who present complaints of pain in the lumbar region with specific diagnosed origin (history of cancer, recent history of spinal trauma or fracture, spinal stenosis); either acute or decompensated systemic or neurological disease; rheumatic diseases; thoracoabdominal surgery in the previous 12 months, history of spine surgery; who enrolled in physical therapy treatment in the previous 12 months for LBP; severe visual deficits and severe cognitive deficits detected by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recruitment rate (time Frame: during the enrollment): registries of the number of people recruited in twelve months and registries of the number of eligible participants who agreed to participate in the study in 12 months. ;Retention rate (time Frame: each week until follow-up assessment after the intervention): retention of participants enrolled into the trial. ;Adherence to treatment (time frame: each week until week 8 of intervention): frequency of attendance of intervention sessions. The adherence criterion will be the presence of 75% or more attendance registries. ;Adherence to home exercise (time frame: follow-up assessment one week after the intervention): 0-24 Exercise adherence rating scale, where the cutoff point for adherence is 17 points. ;Difficulty in understanding the intervention(time frame: follow up assessment 1 week after the intervention): participants answered the question: "How difficult did you have to understand any information/content at the time of training?" The answers will be on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = no difficulty; 10 = extreme difficulty. The percentage of individuals with response equal to or less than 5 will be presented.;Difficulty in executing home exercises (time frame: follow-up assessment one week after the intervention): participants answered two questions: "How much difficulty did you have to perform the exercises at home?" The answers will be on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = no difficulty; 10 = extreme difficulty. The percentage of individuals with response equal to or less than 5 will be presented. ;Safety to perform exercises at home (time Frame: follow-up assessment one week after the intervention): Participants will answer the question: "how safe did you feel to perform the exercises at home?" The responses will be on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = totally unsafe; 10 = totally secure. The percentage of individuals with response equal to or greater than 5 will be presented. ;Perception about the use of mobile technology (time Frame

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain intensity (Time Frame: before and after the intervention): 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, where 0 is pain-free, and 10 is the worst imaginable pain;Low back pain-related disability (Time Frame: before and one week after the intervention): 0-24 Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, the greater the score, the greater the disability;Patient specific functional limitation (time Frame: before and after the intervention): 0-30 Patient specific functional scale. Self-report of three relevant daily activities impacted by chronic low back pain, each activity scores from 0 to 10 points, where the lower the score, the greater the disability to perform the tasks.;Functional capacity (time Frame:before and after the intervention): Short Physical Performance Battery - SPPB, 0-12 points, where the greater the score, the greater the functional capacity.;Self-efficacy for pain (Time Frame: before and one week after the intervention): 30-300 Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale, the higher the score, the better the self-efficacy;Physical activity levels (Time Frame: before and one week after the intervention): assessed by the short form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Its result is computed in METs, and individuals are classified as insufficiently active, moderately active, or very active;Depressive symptoms (time Frame: before and one week after the intervention): the 0-60 Scale of the Center for Epidemiological Studies, the higher the score, the greater the presence of depressive symptoms ;Concomitant Care-seeking (time Frame: before and one week after the intervention): registries of self-reported extra care for LBP.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAna Ellen;Fabianna Santos;Moraleida

Universidade Federal do Ceará;Universidade Federal do Ceará

anaellen13@gmail.com;fabiannamoraleida@gmail.com+55 (85) 3366 8091;+55 (85) 3366 8091

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)