Evaluation of different restorations types in tooth with root treatment.

Randomized clinical trial of restoration with different direct technique in endodontically treated molars.

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

REBEC

Registry ID

RBR-5x9gss

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2019-11-01

Start date

2019-05-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Molar

Interventions

Control group with n of 40 endodontically treated teeth restored with single composite resin compared to a group of 40 endodontically restored teeth treated with composite resin restoration with trans

Procedure/surgery

E06.323.428

Eligibility

Age

12 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Molars and pre-molars; Endodontic treatment; Absence of pain and endodontic complications; Contact with the antagonist;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Significant tooth loss that justify indirect restorations; Patient with bruxism; Presence of extense parcial prothesis; Total prothesis as antagonist.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate the durability of direct restorations with transfixed fiberglass posts compared to conventional direct restorations using a modified USPHS table with the following criteria: retention, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, color, surface texture, anatomical shape and secondary caries. Follow up every 6 months for 2 years.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected.	—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactBianca Zambiasi

Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

bsoareszambiasi@gmail.com55 51 982283601

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)