Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of two Unicrhomatic Resins in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions

Clinical evaluation of two Unicrhomatic Resins in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: a randomized, triple-blind clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-5w8bgmk
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-07-07
Start date
2025-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth abrasion

Interventions

This is a randomized, equivalence, triple-blind, and two-arms clinical trial. A total of 60 participants possessing 2 non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) associated with dental abrasion and meeting t
a maximum of 3 layers will be applied for each NCCL. After filling the cavity, the finishing of the restorations will be done with fine 862 F.FG.010 and extra-fine 862 EF.FG 0.10 diamond burs (JOTA, F

Sponsors

Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification) I and II; age between 18 and 65 years; good oral hygiene; may be male or female; present at least 20 teeth in occlusion; present at least 2 NCCLs (Non-carious cervical lesions), with a depth greater than 1 mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: People with periodontal disease (probing depth up to 3 mm, bleeding, or mobility up to grade II); people with parafunctional habits; smokers; patients with orthodontic appliances; teeth that serve as prosthetic abutments; pregnant women; people who do not agree with the terms of the research or who have difficulties attending the follow-up appointments after the restoration is performed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected that the color difference, measured by the CIEDE2000 (International Commission on Illumination, Color Difference 2000) formula, with its measurement value ?E00, will be less than 1.8 for both resins used. This evaluation should be performed immediately and during each follow-up period, comparing the color of the resins with that of the tooth substrate in its middle third

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The expected finding is a 10% increase in criteria 3 and 4 (clinically satisfactory and clinically unsatisfactory) in the surface gloss of restorations made with Vittra Unique resin, compared to restorations where Omnichroma resin was used, as evaluated by the World Dental Association (FDI) clinical evaluation criteria at 12 months

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAlessandro Loguercio

Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa

aloguercio@hotmail.com+55 42 9902-9903

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)