Skip to content

Clinical evaluation of posterior teeth restorations with bulk-fill resin composites

Clinical evaluation of class I e II posterior restorations with high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-5v6dsj
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-09-02
Start date
2015-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental caries, Dental Leakage, Dental Restoration Wear, Dental Restoration Failure

Interventions

46 adolescents from 12-18 years of age, showing 3 teeth with dental caries or deficient restorations in posterior teeth will be recruited. Each patient will receive three restorations, each with one
E06.323.428

Sponsors

Faculdade de odontologia da Universidade de Pernambuco
Lead Sponsor
Coordenação de aperfeiçoamento de pessoal de nível superior
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
12 Years to 18 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adolescents from public state schools; Age between 12-18 years, presence of three vital teeth, either decayed or with unsatisfactory restorations (Black Class I or II cavities); the presence of occlusal and proximal contacts; good general health; and no contraindication to dental treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Advanced periodontal disease, non-carious cervical lesions in the teeth selected for the study, posterior teeth with pulpal alterations, teeth endodontically treated, or pulp exposure during the removal of carious tissue, teeth with a history of pain. Smokers and individuals with potential behavioral problems that would not cooperate during interventions were also excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Annual failures rate of the performed restorations, evaluated under the modified USPHS (United States Public Health Service) and FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria, under visual evaluation with direct artificial light, exploratory probe and radiographic examination in all evaluation periodos (6, 12 and 18 months). A annual failure rate of 1 to 3% is expected

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
USPHS criteria (United States Public Health Service): marginal adaptation, color, marginal discoloration, anatomical shape, surface roughness, postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries FDI criteria (World Dental Federation): surface gloss/roughness, surface and marginal staining, color stability and translucency, anatomical shape, fractures and retentions, marginal adaptation, contour and occlusal wear, approximal contact and contour, patients opinion, postoperative sensitivity, recurrent caries, dental fracture.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactGabriela Monteiro

Faculdade de odontologia da Universidade de Pernambuco

gabriela.queiroz@upe.br+55 (81) 3184 7659

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)