Information Technology
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Phase 1 predictive usability assessment – researchers; professionals; professors with expertise in the development of health information technologies belonging to the GESAEUFF and NUPESICA research groups registered in the Directory of Research Groups in Brazil of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq); both genders. Prospective usability assessment - professional nurses with experience in pediatric oncology or pediatric palliative care; both genders. Training nurses' clinical reasoning through fictitious case studies and training with the PaliEnf application: clinical nurses who are actively working in the Pediatric Oncology Intensive Care Unit (PICU) during the research period; both genders. Phase 2: Quasi-experiment - nurses' records in the medical records of children and adolescents who were admitted to the Pediatric Oncology Intensive Care Unit (PICU) during the research period
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Phase 1 (stage 1) predictive assessment: participants with experience period less than five years. Phase 1 (stage 1) prospective assessment: none, all nurses considered specialists in pediatric oncology according to the criteria proposed by Jasper who participate will have their analyzes considered. Phase 1 (stage 3): none, everyone who enters and remains in the research will be trained and their progress will be evaluated. Phase 2: records of children and adolescents who remained hospitalized for less than four days and records selected post-intervention whose nurse's progress was not generated by the PaliEnf application report
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It is expected to increase the quality of nurses' records. This quality will be assessed by the Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes instrument, composed of 29 items divided into four dimensions: nursing diagnoses as a process; nursing diagnoses as a product; nursing interventions; nursing results. In the version validated for use in Brazil, items are classified on a three-point Likert scale, with 0 = not documented; 1= partially documented and 2=complete documentation. If each of the 29 items receives a maximum score of two points, the highest possible score on the Q-DIO is 58 points. The psychometric analysis of the Q-DIO shows internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha greater than 0.70 | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| No secondary outcomes are expected | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Universidade Federal Fluminense