Skip to content

Evaluation of dental extraction made with the less traumatic instrument

Evaluation of exodontic technique with minimally traumatic extractor

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-5n9c8q
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-02-11
Start date
2017-06-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-operative pain, comfort.

Interventions

Patients will be submitted to local infiltrative terminal anesthesia with 4% Articaine Hydrochloride with 1: 100,000 adrenaline in the vestibule area, with eventual infiltration of the gingiva in orde
Procedure/surgery
E06.892

Sponsors

Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte
Lead Sponsor
Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Presentation of at least one residual root or indication of extraction; teeth severely destroyed by caries or fracture to the point of rendering their restoration unfeasible; prosthetic, periodontal or orthodontic indication; teeth of the jaw or jaw; incisors, canines and premolars; agree to participate in the study by signing the TCLE.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with any factor that contraindicated the surgical act; infection installed on site; uncontrolled systemic disorders; diabetes and hypertension; problems in the coagulation cascade; severe anemia; allergies; patients who used some medicine with interference in bone metabolism; pregnant patients; patients who used drugs that stimulated gingival augmentation; asthmatic patients without the opinion of the pulmonologist; patients who had recently had Chikungunya; patients who were not involved in the planning of surgical and anesthetic techniques; not return to data collection; give up participating in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The patient's immediate pain level was 1.50 (SD: ± 1.98), level of pain patient comfort of 4.55 (SD: ± 0.90), level of satisfaction (SD: ± 1.12), pain level with 7 days post 0.73 (SD: ± 1.55) and comfort level with 7 days of 4.75 (SD: ± 0.74).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To describe the complications and limitations of the device during the surgical procedure and in the postoperative period with 7 days, and to mention to identify for which reasons they will occur.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAdyelle Ribeiro

Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte

adyelle.d@hotmail.com+5508433152247

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)