Skip to content

Mckenzie method and Core stabilization exercises in lumbar pain due to disc herniation

Mckenzie Method and Core stabilization exercises in lumbar pain due to disc protrusion

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-5mcvt6
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-06-14
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Displacement of the Intervertebral Disc

Interventions

Group I, Mckenzie group, with 23 subjects. Ten minutes of warm-up will be performed on the bicycle followed by the Mckenzie protocol with three sets with ten repetitions, between sets having an interv
Group II, Core group, with 23 subjects. It will be done 10 minutes of heating on the bike, followed by an intervention protocol with Core stabilization exercises based on static postures, starting wit
Group III, associated group Mckenzie and Core, with 23 subjects. It will be done 10 minutes of warm-up on the bike, followed by the protocol of the Mckenzie method with 5 minutes of rest and after the
Other
H02.010.625

Sponsors

Universidade Luterana do Brasil
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Luterana do Brasil
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of both genders with ages between 18 and 65 years who present low back pain due to PD; not performing any other kind of physiotherapeutic approach to low back pain at the time of the study; have signed the Free and Informed Consent Form; present complementary MRI scans or computed tomography with PD report and / or disc herniation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe vertebral pathologies (fracture, tumors and inflammatory pathologies, such as ankylosing spondylitis); previous surgery in the lumbar region; severe cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory disease; pregnancy; non-attendance in three consecutive or intermittent visits; patient with some neurological disorder and who can not perform the proposed exercises.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain assessment Visual Analog Pain Scale will be used. This instrument is able to quantify the pain subjectively, from zero to 10, being zero with no pain at all and 10 with unbearable pain. For evaluation the researcher will direct the following question to the patient: "How is your pain now?".;Anthropometric evaluation Body mass index (BMI) will be checked by measuring height and body weight. The weight will be measured using a previously calibrated anthropometric scale, the individual being lightly dressed and barefoot. The measurement of height will be performed on the same scale through the stadiometer with the barefoot individual, arms extended along the body and in respiratory apnea. Three measurements of height and weight will be made, and the median of these will be recorded. The BMI calculation is done by dividing the weight (in kilograms) by the height (in meters) squared.;Quality of life assessment For the evaluation of the quality of life will be used the questionnaire SF-3637 according to Annex II. This instrument consists of 11 questions and 36 items that encompass eight domains represented by functional capacity, physical aspects, pain, general health, vitality, social aspects, emotional aspects and mental health. The application of this questionnaire is done through the attribution of a note for each question, later transformed into a scale of "0" to "100" per domain, where "0" corresponds to the worst quality of life and "100" the best quality of life.;Assessment of functional disability Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire will be used to assess disability. This instrument is composed of 24 items that describe everyday situations that patients have difficulty performing due to low back pain. The questions have a dichotomous answer (yes or no) and the end result corresponds to the sum of yes answers. This result can range from 0 to 24, with zero being a person with no complaints and the maximum value for a patient with very severe limitations. Th

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expecteded

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactRodrigo Daitx

Universidade Luterana do Brasil

rodrigo.roseta@hotmail.com+55-51-992123616

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)