Skip to content

Acute effect of low-intensity aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction on motor learning

Aerobic exercise and motor learning: Does blood flow restriction induce increased effects?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-5gkdn2r
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-11-17
Start date
2022-07-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Motor Skills

Interventions

After participants have completed the Informed Consent Form, they will undergo randomization using opaque envelopes, stratifying the participants into three groups: Practice + Aerobic Group with 27 pa
this is advise

Sponsors

Universidade Estadual do Piauí
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Estadual do Piauí
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Be aged between 18 and 50 years old. Both genders. Be right-handed. Be a higher education student, regardless of semester. Have sufficient neuromotor and cognitive conditions to understand and perform the proposed tasks. Have a medical report allowing the practice of physical activity, especially those related to blood flow restriction exercise protocol. Use corrective lenses in case the participant has visual acuity. Sign the Informed Consent Form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Have cardiovascular diseases, a history of thrombosis, respiratory diseases, diabetes mellitus, obesity, or any other medical condition that would prevent the execution of the proposed activities, especially those related to the blood flow restriction exercise protocol. Do not have a medical report indicating any risk in engaging in physical activity, especially related to the blood flow restriction exercise protocol. Have osteoarticular impairments that prevent the execution of the task or may be aggravated due to the proposed practices

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
We expect to find a 12% superior coincidence time (motor performance) in the visuomotor task during the retention test, in favor of the group that underwent aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction compared to the groups that underwent traditional aerobic exercise and the group that did not perform any exercise.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
We expect to observe a lower dual-task cost, calculated by subtracting the coincidence time in the single task from the coincidence time in the dual task, in the visuomotor task during the retention test. This is expected to be in favor of the group that underwent aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction compared to the groups that underwent traditional aerobic exercise and the group that did not perform any exercise.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactGiordano Bonuzzi

Universidade Estadual do Piauí

giordanomgb@gmail.com+55 (86) 3213-7441

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)