Skip to content

Comparison between dry land and aquatic physical therapy effects on physical activity and other clinical variables in asthmatic children

Comparison between aquatic and dry land physical training on exercise capacity and other clinical outcomes in asthmatic children: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-5g9j7k
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-11-05
Start date
2020-11-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

asthma

Interventions

This is a two-arm randomized controlled clinical study. After initial assessment, participants were randomized into dry land therapy group (GL) or aquatic therapy group (GA). 1- GL (35 participants):
10-minute progressive breathing exercises
10-minute progressive peripheral muscle strengthening exercises
20 to 40-minute progressive aerobic exercises
5 minute-active and static stretching exercises to cool down. 2- GA (35 participants): 24 therapy sessions (2x/week during 12 weeks) with aquatic physical training and 4 health education sessions alo
5-minute active and static stretching exercises to cool down. Playful health education sessions took place along with the guardian, in a total of 4 sessions, the participants and guardians learned inf
H02.010.625
E02.779.492
E02.779.474
E02.760.169.063.500.387

Sponsors

Universidade Norte do Paraná - UNOPAR
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Estadual de Londrina - UEL
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
7 Years to 11 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Asthmatic children between 7 and 11 years old; both genders; clinically medicated and stable; recruited through active search in schools; able to perform all of the study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of comorbidities that could prevent performance assessment and intervention procedures; history hospitalization and/or pneumonia 3 months before and during the study; have previous participation in any complementary pulmonary rehabilitation treatment in the last 6 months prior to the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1: Exercise capacity - improvement in the six-minute walk test (6MWT) by an increase in the distance walked in meters, after 12 weeks of intervention.;Outcome found 1: Exercise capacity – significant improvement in the distance covered in both groups in the six-minute walk test (6MWT), however, in the percentage of predicted, only GA showed significance after intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 2: Lung function - improved spirometry with increased values of forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), FEV1 / FVC ratio, average forced expiratory flow obtained during the FVC maneuver, intermediate range between 25 and 75% (FEF25-75) and peak expiratory flow (PEF), as well as improvement in portable PEF and transcutaneous oximetry with increased peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), after 12 weeks of intervention.;Outcome found 2: Lung function – improvement in the values of forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), mean forced expiratory flow obtained during the FVC maneuver, in the intermediate range between 25 and 75% (FEF25-75) and peak expiratory flow (PEF), as well as improvement in portable PEF, after 12 weeks of intervention.;Outcome found 3: Thoracic mobility – the measurement of expiratory xiphoid cirtometry was significant only in GA.;Expected outcome 4: General flexibility - improvement of the sit-and-reach test (TSA) by an increase of reaching in centimeters, after 12 weeks of intervention.;Outcome found 4: General flexibility – there was a significant improvement in the sit and reach test (SRT) in both groups after 12 weeks of intervention.;Expected outcome 5: Respiratory muscle strength - improvement in manovacuometry by an increase of maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) in centimeters of water (cmH2O), after 12 weeks of intervention.;Outcome found 5: Respiratory muscle strength – there was a significant increase in maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) in both groups, after 12 weeks of intervention.;Expected outcome 6: Peripheral muscle strength – improvement in muscle strength in quadriceps, biceps and triceps, after 12 weeks of intervention.;Outcome found 6: Peripheral muscle strength – there was a significant increase in the strength of the three muscles evaluated in both groups, afte

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactJosiane Felcar

Universidade Norte do Paraná - UNOPAR

josianefelcar@gmail.com+55-43-999816540

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)