Benign anorectal diseases: hemorrhoids, anal fissures, and perianal fistula.
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients with grade III to IV hemorrhoids, anal fissure and anorectal fistula with an indication for surgical treatment that meet the following inclusion criteria: age greater than or equal to 18 years and less than or equal to 65 years of age, with I to III American Society of Anesthesiology - ASA.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Contraindication to spinal anesthesia and outpatient stay (absence of telephone contact, difficulty in transportation of locomotion, physical residence in another municipality of anesthetic-surgical intervention and outpatient admission with absence of prescribed postoperative medications), current anorectal inflammatory disease, cognitive disability to respond to the forms, any decompensated clinical pathology, neurological pathology, diabetes mellitus, urge urinary incontinence, previous prostate, renal or urologic surgery and drug allergy or any contraindication to the following drugs: propofol, midazolam, dipyrone, non-hormonal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol, codeine, polyresulin and cinchocaine hydrochloride.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Efficacy of modification of Sacral Spinal Anesthesia compared to Sedation associated with perineal blocks. The primary results are: the efficacy of intraoperative anesthesia, assessed through the need for anesthetic complementation and / or conversion, and the efficacy of postoperative analgesia, assessed through the Visual Analogue Scale - EVA pain in the postoperative period and specifically to the first in the techniques studied. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Safety of modification of Sacral Spinal Anesthesia compared to Sedation associated with perineal blocks The secondary results are: safety of intraoperative anesthesia, evaluated through the interference of anesthetic techniques used in hemodynamic repercussions (noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate - HR), postoperative anesthesia safety, evaluated through the incidence of RUPO in anesthetic techniques studied and the interference of anesthesia in outpatient discharge (incidence of discharge from outpatient discharge and / or unplanned hospital admission) and user satisfaction, assessed by means of a specific form applied to the patient. RUPO was diagnosed through clinical criteria when the patient had voiding desire, but was unable to spontaneously empty the bladder at any time during the first 24 hours after the anesthetic-surgical intervention. The outpatient discharge delay was defined for this study as discharge from the medical service beyond 5 hours after the end of the anesthetic-surgical procedure. Although outpatient discharge delay can be defined as a delay of more than 12 hours after some medical intervention, the purpose of this study did not justify the stay of patients in a health service superior to that time, besides being followed through telephone contact.;User Satisfaction Evaluated through a questionnaire made by Likert's own authors. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Hospital Universitário Professor Alberto Antunes - HUPAA/UFAL