Skip to content

Comparison Between Spinal Erector Spinal Muscle Plane Block with Spinal Anesthesia and Morphine Spinal Anesthesia for Reduction of Post Operative Pain in Inguinal Hernia surgeries

Comparison Between the Locking Techniques of the Erector Spinal Muscle Plan with Spinal Anesthesia versus Isolated or Opioid Spinal Anesthesia for Analgesia in Inguinal Hernioplasties: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-5fg9c8
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-06-06
Start date
2018-12-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult

Interventions

The analysis was divided into three groups: the active control group (n=14) (isolated spinal anesthesia group), the spinal anesthesia group with opioid (n=16) (spinal anesthesia with morphine) and the
Drug
Procedure/surgery

Sponsors

Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina
Lead Sponsor
Sianest Servicos Integrados de Anestesiologia
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients older than 18 years; of both gender; ASA I and II; who underwent open surgery of unilateral elective inguinal hernioplasty

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with other surgery associated with the procedure analyzed (concomitant correction of contralateral or umbilical hernia); patients with ASA greater than III; weight less than 60 or greater than 100 kilograms; history of allergy to any medication of the study; use of anticoagulants or other contraindications to neuraxial block; postoperative cognitive deficit that prevented the patient from understanding / responding to the questionnaire

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
We expected to find a reduction in the values of the Numerical Visual Pain Scale (NVP) that admitted values between 0 and 10, evaluated at immediate in the recovery room up to 2 hours, in the room at the next 12 hours and 24 hours)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
We expected to find a reduction in the incidence of Nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, paresis / paresthesia and site of complications (fever, hematoma, paresthesia of lower limbs, radiculitis by local anesthetic)

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactRoberto;Thiago Benedetti;Sakae

Sianest Servicos Integrados de Anestesiologia;Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina

rhbene@gmail.com;thiagosakae@gmail.com+554832235323;+5504836213950

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)