Skip to content

Training of respiratory muscles in patients with heart failure

Acute effect of inspiratory muscle training on hemodynamic variables in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-5fdjty
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-04-09
Start date
2013-11-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart failure

Interventions

Inspiratory muscle training, 3 sessions will be performed with the power breathe, with loads of 30%, 60% and placebo (load 0), where for this purpose, the spring of the device will be removed. The was
Device
E02.190.525.186

Sponsors

Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
21 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Clinical diagnosis of heart failure; age above 21 years; Doppler echocardiogram with evidence of LV dysfunction LVEF <45% within at least three months; class II and III of the New York Heart Association; stable illness for at least three months; never had or did not undergo treatment with IMT.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Clinical diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; unstable angina; major cardiac arrhythmias; acute myocardial infarction within the last three months; inability to perform the inspiratory exercise session. And also the criteria of exclusion of cardio-bioimpedance; massive pleural effusion; anasarca; moderate or severe aortic regurgitation; patients using intra-aortic balloon; mean blood pressure> 130 mmHg; height 2.30m; weight 155kg and patients with pacemakers with sensors to adjust heart rate according to respiratory rate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Different loads of inspiratory muscle training will produce different hemodynamic responses.;The loads of 30 and 60% produced different hemodynamic responses. The load of 30% generated a decrease in the systolic volume variable and the load of 60% increased cardiac output. The placebo load did not generate significant changes in any parameter.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactLuana Marchese Andrade

Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF

luana_dmarchese@hotmail.com+55 (21) 97132-1183

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)