Evaluation of the strategy of applying universal adhesives on non-carious lesions

Evaluation of adhesive strategy of universal adhesives in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: a randomized clinical trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

REBEC

Registry ID

RBR-5f9gps

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2019-09-17

Start date

2018-11-19

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentin Sensitivity: Gingival Retraction

Interventions

We selected 172 teeth and divided into two different variables: adhesive system (Prime& Bond Active and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick and adhesive strategy (etch-and-rinse and self-etching), totalizi

Procedure/surgery

E06.323.428

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age between 18 and 70 years; minimum of 4 non-carious cervical lesions per individual; minimum of 20 teeth in occlusion; good oral hygiene; cervical lesions deeper than 1mm; vital teeth; teeth without mobility.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Endodontically treated teeth; periodontal disease; xerostomia; orthodontic appliance

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Effectiveness of retention of the restorative material based on the protocols used (types of adhesives and types of strategy). IT will be classified according to the criteria in the following scores: FDI (International Dental Federation), classified in: clinically very good; clinically good; clinically sufficient / satisfactory; clinically unsatisfactory and clinically poor. And USPHS (United States Public Health Service), classified in: alfa (clinically good), brave (clinically acceptable), and Charlie (clinically poor). The restorations will be evaluated after 6 months.	—

Measure

Time frame

Effectiveness of retention of the restorative material based on the protocols used (types of adhesives and types of strategy). IT will be classified according to the criteria in the following scores: FDI (International Dental Federation), classified in: clinically very good; clinically good; clinically sufficient / satisfactory; clinically unsatisfactory and clinically poor. And USPHS (United States Public Health Service), classified in: alfa (clinically good), brave (clinically acceptable), and Charlie (clinically poor). The restorations will be evaluated after 6 months.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Restoration effectiveness on marginal staining and marginal adaptation based on the protocols used (types of adhesives and types of strategy). It will be classified according to the criteria in the following scores: FDI (International Dental Federation), classified in: clinically very good; clinically good; clinically sufficient / satisfactory; clinically unsatisfactory and clinically poor. And USPHS (United States Public Health Service), classified in: alfa (clinically good), brave (clinically acceptable), and Charlie (clinically poor). The restorations will be evaluated after 6 months. ;Sensitivity improvement, evaluated by the numerical pain scale (NRS), verified through the air jet for 10 seconds and 2 cm away from the tooth surface, punctuating its pain on a scale of 0 to 4, which will be recorded before the restorative procedure to compare after the immediate clinical course and after six months.	—

Measure

Time frame

Restoration effectiveness on marginal staining and marginal adaptation based on the protocols used (types of adhesives and types of strategy). It will be classified according to the criteria in the following scores: FDI (International Dental Federation), classified in: clinically very good; clinically good; clinically sufficient / satisfactory; clinically unsatisfactory and clinically poor. And USPHS (United States Public Health Service), classified in: alfa (clinically good), brave (clinically acceptable), and Charlie (clinically poor). The restorations will be evaluated after 6 months. ;Sensitivity improvement, evaluated by the numerical pain scale (NRS), verified through the air jet for 10 seconds and 2 cm away from the tooth surface, punctuating its pain on a scale of 0 to 4, which will be recorded before the restorative procedure to compare after the immediate clinical course and after six months.

—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactRossana de Almeida

CEUMA - Centro Universitário do Maranhão

rossana.almeida@yahoo.com.br+55 98 991281955

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026