FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between two techniques of pulmonary re-expansion in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Comparison between application of recruitment maneuver and manual chest compression and decompression in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-5cmtnk
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-03-01
Start date
2014-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Interventions

The patients will be randomly distributed into three groups, the Control Group (CG), where the patient will hold conventional physiotherapy (FC) consists of breathing exercises , RESPIRON and hiking
Experimental Group One (GEI), where the patient will hold conventional physiotherapy associated with alveolar recruitment maneuver
and Experimental Group Two (GEII), where the patient will hold conventional physiotherapy associated with the Manual Chest Compression and Descompression Maneuver. All patients will be evaluated in fo
Other
H02.010.625

Sponsors

Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Lead Sponsor
Fabiana Della Via
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
15 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing gastroplasty by laparoscopic; normal pulmonary function or mild disorders; no osteoarticular lesions (rib fractures or unstable thorax); those who agree to sign the Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Hemodynamic instability (Mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg) at the time filed to perform alveolar recruitment maneuver.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement in pulmonary ventilation and gas exchange with the application of conventional physiotherapy, alveolar recruitment and manual chest compression and chest decompression, thus reducing the incidence of pulmonary complications such as atelectasis. To evaluate the improvement of ventilation will be evaluated the following variables before and after intervention: forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) , forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) and forced expiratory flow 25- 75 % (FEF 25-75 %). The improved ventilation will be verified by spirometry and pulse oximetry based statistically significant difference (p<0.05) among the results before and after intervention.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Data not yet completed—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactFabiana Della Via

Universidade Estadual de Campinas

fabianadv@yahoo.com.br55(19)981923394

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)