Skip to content

Skeletal and dental arch changes following rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective randomized controlled study

Skeletal and dental arch changes following rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective randomized controlled study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-5cfqyw
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-08-17
Start date
2016-08-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion/ Cross bite

Interventions

Experimental group 1: 30 patients (15 men and 15 women) with maxillary atresia will undergo maxillary expansion (of the mouth) and teeth with a device fixed at 4 teeth called Hyrax and evaluated after
Device

Sponsors

Universidade Norte do Paraná (UNOPAR)
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Norte do Paraná (UNOPAR)
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
7 Years to 10 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with Angle Class I malocclusion and cross-bite or maxillary atresia; Patients with mixed dentition and acceptable oral health; Patients aged 7 -10 years , with first permanent molars in occlusion; Caucasian; Absence of agenesis, loss of permanent teeth and supernumerary teeth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients that had undergone orthodontic treatment or had a syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cross bite correction in mm, assessed by transverse distance in the molar region, after 6 months of rapid maxillary expansion through digital models

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cephalometric changes, assessed by radiographs after 6 months of expansion; cephalometric changes assessed by radiographs, after 1 year of expansion; Change in dental tipping angle after 6 months through digital models; Changes in dental tipping angle of the teeth after one year through digital models; diastema amount, evaluated clinically in mm with a digital caliper after expanding and Dehiscence and fenestration score clinically evaluated after 6 months. Pain.;Evaluate the slope of the posterior teeth, external transverse distances, internal transverse distances, length of the dental arch, thickness of the buccal and lingual bone plates and level of the vestibular alveolar bone crest on CBCT.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactThais Poleti

Universidade Norte do Paraná (UNOPAR)

thaismaria@hotmail.com+55 (43) 33717991

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)