Skip to content

Efficacy of different physical therapy delivery modalities on adherence and pain in individuals with chronic low back pain

Efficacy of different physiotherapy delivery modalities on adherence and pain in individuals with chronic low back pain: a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial with economic evaluation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-57pgmjr
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-11-13
Start date
2025-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Interventions

This study protocol describes the design of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial, parallel, two-arm with an economic evaluation and a 1:1 allocation ratio. The study will have 80 participants

Sponsors

Departamento de Fisioterapia da Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Lead Sponsor
Departamento de Fisioterapia da Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Individuals of both sexes; between 18 and 65 years old; with non-specific low back pain lasting three months or longer; a score greater than or equal to 3 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS); a score > 14% on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); be able to speak and understand Portuguese; and have access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer with internet connectivity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy; presence of tumors, infections, or metastases; specific causes of chronic low back pain such as radiculopathy, lumbar stenosis, or chronic degenerative disorders; history of fracture or recent orthopedic surgery (in the last 12 months); surgery scheduled for the next 6 months; heart disease, neurological or rheumatic disorders, as well as any medical contraindication to physical activity; score less than 2 on the Mini-Cog; uncorrected hearing and visual impairments; or any health condition that prevents the safe and adequate performance of exercises

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess average pain intensity over the past 7 days using the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Pain intensity change scores will be calculated at baseline, and at 3, 6, and 9 months after randomization;To assess average exercise adherence using the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS-Br). Changes in adherence will be calculated at week 2 of the intervention, end of treatment (3 months), and 6- and 9-month follow-ups

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess function using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline, and at 3, 6, and 9 months after randomization;To assess the overall perception of change at the end of the intervention (3 months) using the 11-point Global Perceived Effect (GPE) Scale ;To assess the level of satisfaction at the end of the intervention (3 months) using the MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care (MRPS);To assess pain self-efficacy using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-10) at baseline, and at 3, 6, and 9 months after randomization;To assess the therapeutic alliance at the end of the intervention (3 months) using the Working Alliance Inventory – Patient (WAI-RS);To assess attendance at appointments through records kept by physiotherapists in treatment notes and by participants in Exercise and Appointment Log;To assess health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months after randomization;To assess the occurrence of adverse events during treatment and 3 months after randomization, by recording the quantity and type of event reported by participants. Any problem experienced in the back or any other part of the body that the participant considers to be a result of the exercise and/or the guidance provided by the physiotherapist will be considered an adverse event;To assess cost-effectiveness using pain intensity 9 months after randomization and cost-utility using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The QALY will be calculated using linear interpolation between the utilities measured at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months after randomization

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactCamila Broisler

Universidade Federal de São Carlos

camilabroisler@estudante.ufscar.br+55 16 3351-8341

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 23, 2026