Skip to content

Effect of different Periodontal Maintenance intervals on the perimplant biological complications.

Effect of different Supportive Periodontal Therapy protocols on the incidence of perimplant biological complications.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-54c7zt
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-09-26
Start date
2016-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

All 50 patients will be subjected to basic periodontal therapy, followed by surgical insertion of dental implants plus a two monthly for test group (N=25) or a six monthly supportive periodontal thera
Procedure/surgery

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Collaborator
Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
40 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: to be 40 to 60 years old; to smoke at least 20 cigarrets a day; to have at least 20 teeth; to present more than 20 % of sites with clinical attachment loss greater than 6 mm and probing pocket depth greater than 5 mm, bleeding on probing. The affected teeth should present more than 30 % of alveolar bone loss; to have lost one or two teeth which need to be replaced by implant supported protheses; to read and sign an informed consent to this study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: need of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical procedures; history of antibiotics or periodontal therapy in the last six months; use of long term antiinflammatory drugs; history of cronic diseases which could interfere with the course of periodontal diseases, including diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, immunodeficiencies; pregnancy or nursing; need of alveolar bone regeneration.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Greater prevalence of biological complications around dental implants in the control group compared to the test group, measured by the probing pocket depth followed by bleeding upoon probing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in the individuals' microbiological profile which could be corretalated with a greater prevalence of peri implant biological complications in the control group compared to the test group.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactEduardo Feres Filho

Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

eduferes@yahoo.com.br55-021-984413522

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)