Skip to content

Study comparing Vaginal Electrostimulation and Electromagnetic Stimulation with a chair in the treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence

Randomized study comparing Intracavitary Electrical Stimulation and chair-assisted Electromagnetic Stimulation therapy in the treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-53c8ppb
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-05-14
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Stress Incontinence Urinary Incontence

Interventions

This is a three-arm, blinded, randomized clinical study. Experimental group: 20 women with stress urinary incontinence will receive extracorporeal magnetic stimulation twice a week for 3 weeks. Contro

Sponsors

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
35 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence with predominance of the stress component; aged between 35 and 65 years; presenting an Oxford score lower than or equal to 3; and able to complete the questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Urgency urinary incontinence; Neurological disorders; Active or recurrent genitourinary tract infection; Pelvic organ prolapse grade 2 or higher; Pregnant women or women with suspected pregnancy; Cognitive impairment preventing understanding of the treatment; Presence of a pacemaker, prosthesis, copper intrauterine device, or any other metallic implant; Women using medications that may cause urinary loss or urinary retention as a side effect; Women with active urinary tract infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome: determine which of the interventions proposed in the study methods had the greatest impact on the treatment of stress urinary incontinence — vaginal electrical stimulation or extracorporeal electromagnetic stimulation — and to compare the results obtained with those of the placebo group in the immediate post-treatment period;Observed outcome 1: vaginal electrical stimulation showed more consistent results in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence when compared with extracorporeal electromagnetic stimulation and the sham group

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 2: compare the scores on the ICIQ-SF questionnaire (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire – Short Form), between the intervention groups and the placebo group in the immediate post-treatment period and after six months;Observed outcome 2: ICIQ scores were more favorable in the vaginal electrical stimulation group than in the extracorporeal electromagnetic stimulation group and the sham group;Expected outcome 3: compare perineometry values, which assess pelvic floor muscle strength, between the intervention groups and the placebo group in the immediate post-treatment period and after six months;Observed outcome 3: Perineometry values were higher in the vaginal electrical stimulation group than in the extracorporeal electromagnetic stimulation group and the sham group;Expected outcome 4: compare the functional assessment of the pelvic floor muscles, using selected components of the PERFECT scale (power, endurance, repetitions, and fast contractions), between the intervention groups and the placebo group in the immediate post-treatment period and after six months;Observed outcome 4: vaginal electrical stimulation group showed improvement in all PERFECT scale domains compared with the extracorporeal electromagnetic stimulation group and the sham group;Expected outcome 5: compare the voiding profile, assessed using a bladder diary, between the intervention groups and the placebo group in the immediate post-treatment period and after six months;Observed outcome 5: vaginal electrical stimulation group showed improvement in stress urinary leakage and nocturia compared with the extracorporeal electromagnetic stimulation group and the sham group;Expected outcome 6: assess the safety profile of the interventions and determine whether any adverse events occurred after treatment or after six months of follow-up; Observed outcome 6: no adverse events occurred during the intervention treatments;Expected outcome 7: compare the scores on the FSFI

Countries

BR

Contacts

Public ContactAndrea Dell'Aquila

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

andreadellaquila.02@gmail.com+55(11)999830864

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026