Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: We included patients with clinical and functional diagnosis of COPD according to the criteria of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) (RABE et al, 2007), both sexes over 50 years of age, clinically stable (outside the period of exacerbation regardless of disease staging, and who used home-based oxygen therapy regardless of the time (hours / day) of use and who were not included in any rehabilitation program or physical training in the last year.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients with other lung diseases (asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, pneumonia) were excluded; presence of other non-pulmonary diseases considered to be incapacitating, severe or difficult to control (eg heart disease or the sequelae of acute or chronic neurological diseases), which could disrupt the application of tests; those with cognitive status compromised according to the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (<13 for illiterates; <18 for individuals with 1 to 7 years of schooling and <26 for 8 years or more of schooling).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome 1: Improvement in exercise capacity, assessed by means of the 6-minute step test (6MW), test where the participant must ascend and descend with a 2-step step, maintaining his normal rhythm for 6 minutes, and the number of repetitions will be recorded at the beginning and at the end of the study and considered for analysis. An increase of at least 15% in the number of replicates will be considered improvement. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome 2: Improvement of the speed of the March, evaluated through the Test of 4 meters, test where the participant must walk a distance of 4 meters, as fast as possible, and gait speed will be recorded at the beginning and at the end of the study and considered for analysis. An increase of at least 20% of walking speed will be considered improvement.;Expected outcome 3: Strength improvement of Lower limbs, assessed by Sit to Test for 1 minute, test where the participant should sit and stand-up from a chair for 30s, and the number of repetitions will be recorded at the beginning and end of the study and considered for analysis. An increase of at least 10% in the total number of times that patient sat and stood-up from the chair will be considered an improvement in strength.;Expected outcome 4: Reduction of dyspnea, assessed by the Medical Research Council (MRC), validated for the Portuguese language of Brazil, where the participant must choose one of the 5 activities listed according to their level of dyspnea, that will be recorded at the beginning and at the end of the study and considered for analysis. Reduction of dyspnoea will be considered when the participant reports at least a decrease of 1 score (example of 4 to 3) on the scale.;Expected outcome 5: Reduction of the fatigue sensation, evaluated through the translated and validated version for the Portuguese language of Brazil by Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), evaluated through the translated and validated version for the Portuguese language of Brazil's Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS-BR), which is a self-report scale that describes the perception of fatigue in relation to daily living activities in the last two weeks, where the participant should choose in a score ranging from 0 (no fatigue) and 7 (too much fatigue), which will be recorded at the beginning and at the end of the study and considered for analysis.;Expected outcome 6: Improvement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), where the pa | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Universidade Federal do Parana