Skip to content

Bed bath with tub / basin and bath bag: micro-biological case-control and cost evaluation

Conventional Bath bed and Bath Bag: case-control microbiological, cost evaluation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-52pq3b
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-01-22
Start date
2015-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

bacterial infections cross infection

Interventions

50 patients will be submitted to the bath using bucket, basin, soap and water. 50 patients will be submitted to the bath with shower bag (Bag Bath). The determination of the group will be made randoml
• Check the cost and benefit of both techniques
• Report frames of skin infection and soft tissue found in conventional and Bag Bath® bath
• Check the nursing time spent for the execution of the two bathing techniques.
Other
N03.219.151.125

Sponsors

Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: dependence on the nursing team; impaired physical mobility; bedridden in the ward admission; up to 48 hours of hospitalization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: partial dependence on the nursing team; They are not bedridden; show on mechanical ventilation; infectious disease of skin and soft tissue (cellulitis; erysipelas; eczema); skin ulcers; pressure; venous; infectious or tumor; previous use of antibiotics.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Microbiological analysis implies the presence or absence of colonization in both the bed bathing procedures: Bag Batth (Group B) and bathing in conventional bed (Group A). The microorganisms are seeded in appropriate culture media (Agar and blood agar Mconkey) for microbiological analysis. The semi-quantitative results will be seen with growth ranging between 1 and 4 crosses. The microorganisms will be identified through biochemical tests in automated machine Vitek 2 (Biomericux).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactDébora ;Débora Paulela;Paulela

Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho;Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho

deborapaulela@fmb.unesp.br;deborapaulela@fmb.unesp.br+55(14)981040471;+55(14)981040471

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)