Comparison of a local anesthetic technique applied by syringe or by computer

Comparative study of length and duration of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block with Lidocaine 2% + Epinephrine 1: 100.000 applied by conventional technique or computerized system

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

REBEC

Registry ID

RBR-4zzc3p

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2018-05-23

Start date

2017-11-08

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental carie

Interventions

After selecting the sample (n=32), the volunteers will be scheduled to begin the restorative treatment. The data collected will correspond to execution time, latency and duration of anesthesia as well

Procedure/surgery

E03.155.086.231

E06.323.428

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 35 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Volunteers aged between 18 and 35 years; who have not undergone blockade anesthesia in the region in the two weeks prior to the study; present 02 lower molars in need of restorative treatment; not having used any medication that could alter the perception of pain in the two weeks prior to the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Hypersensitivity to drugs used in the study - 2% Lidocaine with epinephrine 1: 100,000; Benzocaine 20%; presence of organ dysfunction or clinically significant deviation from normal, assessed during anamnesis; odontophobic; pregnant and / or lactating women; history of drug addiction or alcohol abuse.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Increased duration of anesthetic effect through the computerized system around 40%	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected	—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactLiane Souza

Universidade Federal de Sergipe

odontoliu@gmail.com+55-079-999777001

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)