Skip to content

Laser surgery or extracorporeal lithotripsy: which is the best for quality of life?

Assessment of the impact on the quality of life of patients undergoing Ureteroscopy with Holmium laser compared to Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4xz3q8w
Enrollment
110
Registered
2026-03-12
Start date
2022-11-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ureterolithiasis

Interventions

This is a two-arm randomized clinical study, blinded to the evaluator. 55 patients underwent treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, 55 patients underwent ureterorenolithotripsy with hol

Sponsors

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Symptomatic adults; over 18 years of age; ureterolithiasis confirmed by CT scan; stone`s maximum diameter between 5 and 20 millimeters

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: other urological conditions; pelvic pain syndrome; using anticholinergics; alpha-blockers; calcium channel antagonists; phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors; under 18 years of age; illiterate people; psychiatric disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
expected outcome 1: patients undergoing ureterorenolithotripsy would have quality of life scores up to 20% lower than those in the group undergoing extracorporeal lithotripsy.;outcome found 1: patients undergoing ureterorenolithotripsy had better quality of life scores compared to the group undergoing extracorporeal lithotripsy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
expected outcome 1: there would be a correlation between complications and stone-free rate and quality of life scores.;outcome found 2: there was a positive correlation between stone-free rate and quality of life scores, and a negative correlation between complications and quality of life scores

Countries

BR

Contacts

Public ContactAlexandre Danilovic

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

alexandre.danilovic@hc.fm.usp.br+55 (11) 26618080

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026