Skip to content

Evaluation of ultrasound impact on deep venous catheterization in children admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the Clinical Hospital - Unicamp.

Evaluation of ultrasound impact on central venous catheterization in pediatric patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the Clinical Hospital - Unicamp

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4t35tk
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-11-21
Start date
2014-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric Intensive Care Units

Interventions

Intervention in the Study Group (US guidance Group): Thirty-nine patients were randomized to the intervention group and underwent venipuncture of the internal jugular vein under direct visualization i
Device
Procedure/surgery

Sponsors

Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Lead Sponsor
Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
28 Days to 14 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 28 days to 14 years who required central venous access (at the discretion of the attending physician); Patients admitted at PICU in the presence of at least one of the researchers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children with internal jugular vein thrombosis; Children with coagulation disorders; Children with tracheostomy; Children who underwent cannulation of veins other than internal jugular veins

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
EXPECTED OUTCOME 1 The expected primary outcome was a 25% reduction in failure rates for central venous catheterization. Categorical variables were described as absolute and relative frequencies. After the intervention, the Pearson's chi-squared or Fisher's exact test were used to compare proportions. All analyses were performed in SPSS version 22.0. Significance was defined as p < 0.05;OUTCOME FOUND 1 Successful venous puncture was achieved in 94.9% (37/39) and 61% (25/41) of patients in the US-guidance and control groups, respectively (relative risk [RR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50–0.83; p <0.001).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
EXPECTED OUTCOME 2 Increase venipuncture rates successfully in up to three tests. Categorical variables were described as absolute and relative frequencies. After the intervention, the Pearson's chi-squared or Fisher's exact test to compare proportions. All analyses were performed in SPSS version 22.0. Significance was defined as p < 0.05;OUTCOME FOUND 2 Success during the first attempt was seen in 94.9% (37/39) and 34.1% (14/41) of venous punctures in the US guidance and control groups, respectively (p <0.001). ;EXPECTED OUTCOME 3 Reduction in puncture times. After the intervention, the Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare medians between groups.;OUTCOME FOUND 3 The median puncture time was significantly lower in the US guidance than in the control group (16 sec, IQR [8-39] vs. 81 sec, IQR [16-346], respectively; p = 0.003, Fig 2). ;EXPECTED OUTCOME 4 Reduction in number of attempts required to success. After the intervention, the Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare medians between groups.;OUTCOME FOUND 4 The median number of required attempts for successful cannulations was lower in the US guidance group than in the control group (1 attempt, IQR [1-1] vs. 1 attempt, IQR [1-3]; p = 0.001).;EXPECTED OUTCOME 5 Reduction in the rate of complications such as hematomas, arterial puncture, pneumothorax and procedural-related infections. Categorical variables were described as absolute and relative frequencies. After the intervention, the Pearson's chi-squared or Fisher's exact test to compare proportions. All analyses were performed in SPSS version 22.0. Significance was defined as p < 0.05;OUTCOME FOUND 5 Neither pneumothorax nor infections procedure-related were reported in either group. The incidences of hematomas, the most frequent complication, were 2.6% (1/39) and 26.8% (11/41) in the US guidance and control groups, respectively (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.61–0.89; p = 0.003; Table 1). The second most frequent complication was arterial puncture, which o

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactTiago Souza

Universidade Estadual de Campinas

tiago.souza@hc.unicamp.br+55-019-981514355

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026