Tracked people with multiple sclerosis and perform intervention with goal of preventing problems of muscle weakness and improvement of the decrease of balance. Immune System Diseases, Multiple Sclerosis, Progressive Chronic Multiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis Relapsing-Sender.
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Medical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis for two years; Undergoing treatment with medical follow-up; Obtain Expanded Disability Status Scale EDSS score of less than 6.0; Do not have medical diagnosis of diseases secondary to Multiple Sclerosis as: physical and / or mental deficiencies; heart diseases; Dyslipidemias; And Diabetes Mellitus;
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Not being in medical follow-up Failing to perform the physical tests.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| As it is a rare pathology was worked with the amount of people registered in the Association of people with sclerosis Cuiabá and who accepted to participate or who were not in the wheelchair or bedridden. 1) Expected outcome It was evaluated the differences in physical and balance aspects in patients with multiple sclerosis practitioners of Tai-Geiko and sedentary. Expected Outcomes Trajectory traversed (expected to decrease in the experimental group and maintain in the control group) Anteroposterior amplitude (cop) (expected to decrease in the experimental group and maintain in the control group) Medium-lateral amplitude (ml) (expected to decrease in the experimental group and increase in the control group) Elliptical area (expected to decrease in the experimental group and maintain in the control group) Median anteroposterior frequency (expected to increase in the experimental group and decrease in the control group) Median-lateral medial frequency (expected to increase in the experimental group and decrease in the control group) It was expected that the experimental group and control did not present improvement of scapular, lumbar and manual muscle strength. The experimental group was expected to improve agility in lifting, walking and sitting. The experimental group was expected to improve the performance of two tasks at the same time (double task) The experimental group was expected to show improvement in walking speed 2) Methods used to evaluate primary outcome Power Platform Scapular dynamometer Lumbar Dynamometer Hand Dynamometer Test Time up and go- TUG Double task test Walking speed 3) Presentation of parameters Reduction of the trajectory traversed through the force platform method from the variation of at least 6% in the pre and post intervention measurements (above 35cm high risk of fall). Decreased anteroposterior amplitude by the force platform method from the variation of at least 2% in the pre and post intervention measurements (above 10 cm h | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary outcome was not expected | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso