Skip to content

Effect of Therapeutic Ultrasound on recovery after Elbow Fracture surgery

Additional effect of Therapeutic Ultrasound in postoperative rehabilitation of Elbow Fractures: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4shpqhj
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-04-24
Start date
2025-06-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Humeral fractures distal

Interventions

This is a randomized, triple-blind, controlled clinical trial with patients who underwent surgical treatment after elbow fractures. Patients will be divided into 2 groups: the intervention group with
E02.760.169.063.500.387

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
Lead Sponsor
Programa de Pós Graduação em Saúde Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Individuals aged 18 to 70 years; of both sexes; referred for physiotherapy treatment from the sixth week of surgical intervention after elbow fractures; with limited range of motion greater than or equal to twenty degrees of extension deficit; or less than or equal to one hundred and twenty degrees of elbow flexion; elbow fractures involving the distal segment of the humerus; proximal segment of the ulna; fracture of the neck and head of the radius according to Mason's Classification; elbow fractures and dislocations such as Hotchkiss's terrible triad; Monteggia lesion; transolecranon fracture and dislocation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with bilateral elbow fractures or whose indicated treatment is total elbow arthroplasty; pregnant women; neurological, rheumatic or psychiatric diseases that compromise rehabilitation; previous history of elbow stiffness; previous surgical procedure on the elbow; existence of Kirschner wires or cerclage wires in the proximal ulna and distal humerus; Mini-Mental State Examination score of less than 24 points for those with higher education and 18 points with low to moderate level of education

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the additional effect of therapeutic ultrasound on the range of motion of elbow flexion and extension measured in degrees with a manual goniometer in the orthostatic position, based on the observation of a variation of at least 12 degrees in the pre- and post-intervention measurements, with data collected at baseline, tenth week post-operatively, fourteenth week post-operatively and at follow-up after 6 months of the intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To investigate the additional effect of ultrasound on elbow functionality using the Disabilities of the Outcome Measure of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire measured in points, based on the observation of a variation of at least 11 points in the pre- and post-intervention measurements, with data collected at baseline, sixth week of intervention, tenth week of intervention and at follow-up after 6 months;To evaluate the additional effect of ultrasound on the range of motion of pronation and supination measured in degrees with a manual goniometer, based on the observation of a variation of at least 6 degrees in the pre- and post-intervention measurements, with data collected at baseline, sixth week of intervention, tenth week of intervention and at follow-up after 6 months;To investigate the additional effect of ultrasound on handgrip strength, measured in kilograms-force (kgf) using a portable hand dynamometer, based on the observation of a variation of at least five kilograms-force between the pre- and post-intervention measurements and post-intervention, with data collected at baseline, sixth week of intervention, tenth week of intervention and at follow-up after 6 months;To investigate the additional effect of ultrasound on pain, measured using the numerical pain scale in points from zero to ten, based on a variation of at least one point between pre- and post-intervention measurements,data being collected at baseline, sixth week of intervention, tenth week of intervention and at follow-up after 6 months of intervention

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactPriscila Veras

Programa de Pós Graduação em Saúde Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

priscilaveras@gmail.com+55 (32) 40095322

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 20, 2026