Skip to content

Use of Lasetherapy in Local Alterations of the Bothrops Snakebite (jararaca) in the Brazilian Amazon: Use of Laser in snake poisoning

Evaluation of the use of Low Intensity Laser in local changes in patients bitten by bothrops gender officers in the brazilian amazon: controlled and randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4qw4vf
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-04-09
Start date
2020-04-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Snake Bites

Interventions

The population considered for the present study will correspond to patients treated by the FMT-HVD institution, with botropic accidents. As a phase II A (therapeutic) clinical trial study, the populat
2. Administration of pre-serotherapy using corticosteroids and antihistamines
3. Administration of antivenom 30 minutes after pre-serotherapy.First phase (T1 - first laser application and first clinical evaluation) will take place as follows: - Group 1 considered to be control
E02.594

Sponsors

Universidade do Estado do Amazonas
Lead Sponsor
Fundação de medicina Tropical heitor Vieira Dourado
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients eligible for the study must meet the following characteristics: have less than 24 hours after the accident; being over 18 years old and not having undergone serotherapy for the current botropic accident at another institution.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Those who have an abscess or infection clearly established at the time of admission will be excluded; patient with dry sting; pregnant; Immunocompromised; use anti-inflammatory or antibiotic and have Diabetes mellitus (DM).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1: It is expected to find a decrease in myonecrone at the site of the snakebite with the use of laser within 48 hours after admission, being evaluated by creatine phosphokinase (CK).;Outcome found 1: The primary efficacy endpoint of this study was myolysis estimated by the value of creatine phosphokinase (IU/L) within 48 hours after admission. A 53.0% drop in CK was found while the control group increased by 35.0%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 2: The exploratory efficacy outcomes were: i) pain intensity as measured by a numerical scale and time from admission to reduction of pain intensity by 50%, at 24 and 48 hours after admission; ii) the circumference measurement ratio (circumference of the bitten limb/circumference of the contralateral limb; expressed in %) and time from admission to reduction of circumference measurement ratio by 50%, at 24 and 48 hours after admission; iii) extent of edema in the affected limb by measuring the distance between the distal and proximal points showing swelling (in centimeters) and time from admission to the reduction of the extent of edema by 50%, at 24 and 48 hours after admission; iv) difference between the bite site temperature and that of the contralateral limb (in OC) and time from admission to this reduction by 50%, at 24 and 48 hours after admission; v) need for the use of analgesics in a follow-up of 48 hours; vii) frequency of secondary infections in a follow-up of 48 hours; viii) necrosis in a follow-up of 48 hours, and ix) disability assessment from four to six months after patients’ discharge using the WHODAS 2.0. and assess the feasibility of the proposed intervention.;Outcome found 2: Mean pain intensity 48 hours after admission was significantly lower in the LLLT group (2.9±2.7) in relation to the comparator (5.0±2.4) (P=0.002). The mean circumference measurement ratio was significantly lower in the LLLT group (6.6±6.6; in %) in relation to the comparator (17.1±11.6, in %) (P<0.001). The mean edema extent was significantly lower in the LLLT group (25.8±15.0; in cm) in relation to the comparator (40.1±22.7; in cm) (P=0.001). No difference was observed between the two groups regarding the mean difference between the bite site temperature and the contralateral limb (P=0.110; in OC). No differences were found when comparing WHODAS 2.0 domains between the control and laser groups for each separate domain or the summary scores.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactÉrica Carvalho

Universidade do Estado do Amazonas

ecarvalho@uea.edu.br+55-92-982822012

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026