Skip to content

Effectiveness of prayer in chronic kidney patients

Effectiveness of prayer on chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4pphkf
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-06-30
Start date
2018-09-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hope

Interventions

Intervention Group: 31 patients undergoing hemodialysis. Subjected to pre-theses, intervention and post-tests. The intervention applied in this study was the intercession prayer, elaborated from Psalm
Behavioural

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Ceará
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Ceará
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age over 18 years, literate, clinically stable and oriented about time and space when reaching 24 or more points in the Mini Mental State Exam.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of deafness, as it was decided to apply the prayer with the aid of headphones; present limitations that compromised speech; and who have used anxiolytics within 24 hours prior to the intervention.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected primary outcome 1: Higher averages, in the post-test after 15 days, with statistical significance, of the Religious / Spiritual Coping of the patients in the Intervention Group (submitted to prayer), when compared to the patients in the Control Group (not exposed to prayer), measured by the brief religious-spiritual Coping Scale, which was answered by the participants in the pre- and post-test measurements. Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used for intergroup comparison. The level of significance was set at 5% and the 95% confidence interval for all tests.;Effectively observed outcome 1: in the post-test, both groups showed a significant increase in Religious / Spiritual Coping: the mean of the Control Group went from 2.57 to 2.64 (p = 0.001); and that of the Intervention Group went from 2.35 to 2.48 (p = 0.015). The Groups were similar in the mean obtained in the post-test (p = 0.116).;Expected primary outcome 2: Higher medians, in the post-test, with statistical significance, of the Hope Score of patients in the Intervention Group (submitted to prayer), when compared to patients in the Control Group (not exposed to prayer), measured by the Herth Hope Scale, which was answered in the pre- and post-test measurements. For intergroup comparison, Friedman's Tests were used. The level of significance was set at 5% and the 95% confidence interval.;Effectively observed outcome 2: in the post-test, both groups showed a significant increase in the Hope Score: the mean of the Control Group went from 44.13 to 46.35 (p = 0.001); and that of the Intervention Group went from 44.13 to 46.35 (p = 0.000).;Expected primary outcome 3: lowest averages, in the post-test, with statistical significance, of the Anxiety of patients in the Intervention Group (submitted to prayer), when compared to patients in the Control Group (not exposed to prayer), measured by the State Anxiety Inventory , which was answered by the participants in the pre- and post-test measurements. For int

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No secondary outcomes were expected.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactJoselany Caetano

Universidade Federal do Ceará

joselany@ufc.br+55-083-33668455

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026