Skip to content

The use of isostreching and exercises with video games in the treatment of Fibromyalgia

The use of isostreching and aerobic exercises with virtual rehabilitation in the treatment of Fibromyalgia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4pmzpq
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-01-15
Start date
2012-08-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Interventions

Isostretching group (IG): 20 women fibromyalgia treated with the technique Isostretching three times per week for one hour, and for 8 weeks in groups. Group aerobic exercise with virtual rehabilitati
Other
E02.779

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Alfenas (UNIFAL)
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Alfenas (UNIFAL)
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Females; aged 18 years; Fibromyalgia diagnosis according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR); history of widespread pain persisting for more than three months, affecting both sides of the body; presence of at least 11 of 18 tender points.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy; presence of cardiovascular, orthopedic, systemic dermatological and neurological disorders; cognitive level inadequate to meet the guidelines offered

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reducing the total number of tender points in both groups by analysis of computed algometry the initial assessment (A0) after 10th session (A1) and the 20th session (A2) in which IG obtained in A0 (16.70±1.64), A1(13.80±3.29) and A2(10.50±1.22) and another group got WG A0 (16.72±2.00), A1(12.00±3.06) and A2(10.87± 4.12);reducing the impact of fibromyalgia in both groups by analysis of the total scores of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) in which IG A0(71.92± 9.05), A1(63.23±13.55) and A2(52.37±14.00) and WG A0(64.53±15.90), A1(41.41±13.66) and A2(34.17± 7.50).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Significant improvement in static balance only for IG resulting in lower maximum initial pressure of the feet of A0 (97,64±43,55), A1(92,65±32.87) and A2(87,55±28,89). WG kept his balance in similar reviews A0(41,80±4,53), A1(44,69±7,50) and A2(42,89±7,00).

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactMarcelo de Carvalho

Universidade Federal de Alfenas (UNIFAL)

marcelofisioterapia@gmail.com+55(35)32922377

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)