Skip to content

Immediate effects of mild electrical stimulation on the skin to help to reduce pain during Intrauterine Device (IUD)

Immediate effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation (TENS) on pain control during Intrauterine Device insertion: a randomized clinical trial - TENS-PAIN IUD Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for pain control during Intrauterine Device insertion

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4pftw9t
Enrollment
180
Registered
2026-05-18
Start date
2026-01-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation

Interventions

This is a randomized, controlled, parallel clinical trial with three intervention groups allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio, according to a computer-generated randomization list in blocks of 10 participants.

Sponsors

Hospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti - CAISM
Lead Sponsor
Hospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti - CAISM
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 45 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women aged 18–45 years; nulliparous or multiparous; with indication for intrauterine device insertion, regardless of type; attending the Family Planning Clinic of UNICAMP; able to understand the study and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain; chronic or pre-procedure use of opioids or psychoactive drugs; skin lesions at the electrode application site; use of a pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator; neurological impairment; inability to understand the study or refusal to provide informed consent; previous experience with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation; contraindications to ketorolac tromethamine, including hypersensitivity to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs; history of asthma or allergic reactions to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs; active peptic ulcer disease, gastrointestinal bleeding or coagulation disorders, severe renal or hepatic impairment, or use of anticoagulants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected that the application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation during intrauterine device insertion will be superior to ketorolac tromethamine and usual care in reducing pain intensity as measured by the visual analog scale;It is expected that application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation will be more effective in reducing immediate discomfort after intrauterine device insertion compared with medication and usual care;It is expected that women undergoing transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation will report greater satisfaction with the procedure than those receiving medication or usual care;It is expected that the rate of unsuccessful intrauterine device insertion will be similar across the three study groups;It is expected that the application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation will not increase the total duration of intrauterine device insertion compared with medication alone or usual care;It is expected that anxiety levels will be similar across all groups transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, medication, and usual care

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected

Countries

BR

Contacts

Public ContactAna Lisboa Lima Fontes

Hospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti - CAISM

acllfontes@gmail.com+55(79)991375726

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026