Skip to content

Effects of Osteopathy and Ankle Self-Mobilization on Athlete Ankle Range of Motion Gain

Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment versus Talocrural Automobilization on Ankle Mobility and Functionality in Athletes

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4p29wg5
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2022-04-28
Start date
2022-05-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Joint Range of Motion

Interventions

Group I, Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (Ankle and foot, knee, hip and lumbosacral spine joint manipulation techniques will be applied. will be performed by a physical therapist). Group II, Self-M
E02.190.599

Sponsors

UDF - Centro Universitário do Distrito Federal
Lead Sponsor
UDF - Centro Universitário do Distrito Federal
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Athletes who practice soccer, running, crossfit or any other modality that generates joint impact in the execution of their movements; practitioner of the modality with training frequency of at least three times a week; Age between 18 and 40 years; Possess reduced active range of motion (ROM) of ankle dorsiflexion (less than 20 degrees of ROM for dorsiflexion in one or both ankles), either in open kinetic chain (OCC) or chain closed kinetics (CCF)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Acute or chronic muscle, ligament, joint and/or tendon injuries; Use of lower limb prostheses; Congenital orthopedic and neurological injuries

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mean difference of 10% in stride, assessed by static baropodometry, at baseline and at the end of the study;Mean difference of 10% in lower limb functionality, assessed using the foot and ankle ability measure and y test questionnaire, at the beginning and end of the study;Mean 10% difference in posterior chain flexibility, assessed using the sit-and-reach test, at baseline and at the end of the study

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean difference of 10% in ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, assessed by fleximetry, at baseline and at the end of the study

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public Contactjulio guglielmin

Faculdade de Ceilândia

juliozagofisio@hotmail.com+55-61-996566627.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)