Gingival recession with tooth root exposure
Conditions
Interventions
Split mouth clinical study:
Test group 11 patients with bilateral gingival recession in Miller's class I or II maxilla received root coverage on one side of the connective graft through the tunneling
Procedure/surgery
E06.892
Sponsors
São Leopoldo Mandic
São Leopoldo Mandic
Eligibility
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Volunteers in good general health (ASA I), with bilateral Muller class I or II gingival recession of at least one dental element in each quadrant of the maxilla (incisors to second premolar), with periodontal health and good plaque control.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Smoking, diabetic, pregnant or lactating volunteers with periodontal disease were excluded.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Through clinical evaluation 6 months after the procedure, it is expected that the two materials used, connective graft and PRF (Plasma rich in fibrin) can cover the exposed tooth root.;The results showed that there was no difference between the groups (connective graft and PRF) for the parameters depth of probe and clinical level of insertion. There was a significant reduction in the extent of the recession in both groups, with no statistically significant difference between them after three months, but with a statistical difference after six months, favorable to the connective tissue group.;Through clinical evaluation 6 months after the procedure, it is expected that the two materials used, connective graft and PRF (Plasma rich in fibrin) can cover the exposed tooth root.;The results showed that there was no difference between the groups (connective graft and PRF) for the parameters depth of probe and clinical level of insertion. There was a significant reduction in the extent of the recession in both groups, with no statistically significant difference between them after three months, but with a statistical difference after six months, favorable to the connective tissue group. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It was observed that the connective tissue graft had values 20% higher in the rate of total coverage of gingival recessions and in the average percentage of root coverage. Therefore, the connective tissue graft was more effective in root coverage, in increasing thickness and in the amount of inserted gingiva after six months of evaluation when compared to the PRF (Fibrin Rich Plasma) group. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactTatiane Caldeira Ulzefer
São Leopoldo Mandic
Outcome results
None listed