Skip to content

Analysis of small and conventional implants in the Maxilla.

Analysis of extra-short and conventional implants in the posterior region of Maxilla. splint-mounth randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4mrftz
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-04-18
Start date
2018-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar bone Loss

Interventions

Maxillary sinus floor augumentation associated with conventional implants placement (n = 20 maxillary sinus) at the control group or extra-short implants placement (n = 20 maxillary sinus)at the test
Other
D25.339.312

Sponsors

Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara- Universidade Estadual Paulista
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara- Universidade Estadual Paulista
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Similar degree of atrophy in bilateral posterior maxilla region with a minimum subantral bone height of 4.0 mm and a width of 6.0 mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: General contraindications to surgeries with dental implants; Patient submitted to irradiation in head and neck region; Patients immunosuppressive and immunosuppression; Treated or being treated with anti-resorptive medicinal products or alter bone metabolism; Untreated periodontitis; Poor oral and low hygiene motivation; Pregnancy or Infant; Diabetes uncontrolled; Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations regarding treatment; Substance abuse; Lack of dentition opposite the area intended to receive the implants; Extraction sites (Less than 3 months after extraction); Smoking.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The success rates of implants, that will be evaluate by clinical analyzis, of the short implants installed in the posterior maxillary region will be similar or superior (around 5%) to the success rates of conventional implants installed in the same area, but where the grafting procedure was previously performed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The bone level to be evaluated by radiographic analyzes of the short implants installed in the posterior maxilla will be similar or superior (less than 2 mm of bone loss) than in the conventional implants installed in the same area, but where the grafting procedure was previously performed.;The stability of the implants to be analyzed by frequency of resonance in short implants installed in the posterior region of the maxilla will be similar or inferior (about 10%) than in conventional implants installed in the same area, but where the grafting procedure was performed previously .

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactElcio Marcantonio Junior

Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara-Unesp

elciojr@foar.unesp.br+55(16)33016378

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)