Skip to content

Assessment in humans of aesthetics and functions of common implants restored with crowns and porcelain metal crowns and porcelain only

Comparative analysis of aesthetic and functional parameters of implant abutments using ceramic and metallic

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4hmrph
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2012-01-31
Start date
2011-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental implant, dental implant fixed, arcade, Edentulous, Partially, cosmetic dentistry

Interventions

1) Surgical procedures: For the 35 individuals selected, the placement of surgical implants (Porous Master line, hexagonal - Connection Implant Systems, Arujá / SP, Brazil) will be conducted in accord
Of the sixty initial radiographs (T1) and sixty taken after a period of osseointegration (T2) will be chosen 14 of each group, which will feature a range of 10 to 20 degrees of vertical angle and 10 º
GAZ - group zirconia abutments prefabricated implants in the thirty remaining. The abutments will be to varying external hexagon only possible angle and diameter of the platform used. Crowns and / or
procedure/surgery
E06.892

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: of both genders, without regard to race, aged 18 years and need for rehabilitation with crowns and bridges up to two elements of the implant in the anterior region, totaling sixty sites for implants .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: smoking, with systemic diseases, need for bone grafting and parafunctional habits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Identify an aesthetic best rehabilitated with implants in the pillars and crowns with zirconia copings made by CAD CAM system, in relation to conventional metal-ceramic crowns. The evaluations will follow the parameters: Evaluation of clinical criteria for success "1" - the absence of persistent subjective complaints such as pain, foreign body sensation, and / or paresthesia, "2" - the absence of recurring peri-implant infection with suppuration and, "3" - lack of mobility. Evaluation of the index card as a visual scale, where "0" - no plaque deposits, "1" - sliding plate visible only after the probe on the free surface of the marginal gingiva of the implant, "2" - plate clinically visible and , "3" - plate abundant. Evaluation of the sulcus bleeding index scores using "0" - no bleeding when the tip of the periodontal probe is passed along the gingival margin to the implant, "1" - isolated bleeding points visible, "2" - bleeding forms a confluent red line on the shore and, "3" - profuse bleeding. Aesthetic evaluation of the index according to the following criteria: relevance, inclusion of peri-implant soft tissues relevant specific parameters inherent in the restoration, establishment of clinical acceptability, ease of use and reproducibility. For aesthetic content will be used the following scores: PES, which evaluates the gum tissue around the implant and WES, which will assess part of the prosthetic crown that emerges from the peri-implant tissues. For the PES will be used the following scores: "1" - corresponds to mesial papilla, "2" - corresponds to the distal papilla; "3" - curvature of the cervical buccal mucosa, "4" - level / height of the vestibular and cervical mucosa; "5" - root convexity, color and texture of the tissue over the implant. For the WES scores will be used for aesthetic parameters of the crowns: "1" - corresponds to the shape of the tooth, "2" - corresponds to the volume, "3" - color "4" - the texture of the facial and cervical face, "5

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Bone gain around implants assessed by radiographic analysis based on the Likert scale with the aid of digital subtraction radiography. Expected to be observed that the initial radiograph (T1) in relation to the second radiograph (T2) show a clear picture that there was bone formation around the implant platform (site mesial and distal site), and the overall image quality excellent for purposes of evaluating change or gained bone around the implant platform, and that the appraiser would have confidence in making opinion about gain or bone loss around the implant platform based on this image (Likert Scale).

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactThais Bittencourt

Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

thaisbitte@hotmail.com(32) 3224 - 5797

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)