Skip to content

Team-Based Learning: comparing learning methods in nursing

Team-Based Learning: A randomized clinical trial in undergraduate nursing and the construction of educational technology.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4f32xy
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-06-01
Start date
2017-02-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

This study will be conducted in healthy volunteers, undergraduate nursing students from Unesp, for evaluation of teaching methodology.

Interventions

This study will be conducted in healthy volunteers, undergraduate nursing students from Unesp, for evaluation of teaching methodology. The students were randomized, by lot, into the pre-existing clas
Other

Sponsors

Departamento de enfermagem da Unesp
Lead Sponsor
Unesp ( Universidade Estadual Paulista)
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The students of the 3rd year of undergraduate nursing; will be included in the study, enrolled in the average 27 students in the discipline of Nursing in Surgical Center, who agree to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Students who are not in class at the time of data collection will be excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
With this study it is expected the improvement of the knowledge regarding the content delivered, through the implementation of the TBL method. The instrument for data collection was a questionnaire for pre and post intervention, containing 10 multiple choice questions, with four response options, specially structured for this study and applied in both research groups. After 30 days of carrying out the activities, the students performed a new evaluation. ;The analysis of the pre and post test evaluations showed that the TBL group presented more correct answers when compared to the traditional class group, with a significant difference (p = <0.0001). In the evaluation after 30 days of the intervention, the TBL group also presented However, this difference was not significant. (Table 1) Table 1. Multiple comparisons of group evaluations. Botucatu, 2017 MULTIPLE COMPARISON TBL TRADITIONAL AVERAGE MOMENT DP DP AVERAGE DP Pre-intervention 29.36 ± 6.40 aA * 19.91 ± 4.06 b c B * Post intervention 37.21 ± 2.49 b A * 25.45 ± 4.11 a c B * After 30 days 30.57 ± 4.03 aA * 27.60 ± 5.08 aA * P = <0.0001

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not expected

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactSabrina Sakamoto

Unesp ( Universidade Estadual Paulista)

saflafe2014@gmail.com55 (18) 981268489

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)