Skip to content

Comparison of Bio Adhesive and Sutures in the Healing of the Palate after Graft Removal: randomized clinical trial

Comparison of Bio-Adhesive based on Cyanoacrylate and Conventional Sutures in Healing the Palate after Removing the Soft Tissue Graft: Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4dmnrr
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-09-01
Start date
2020-10-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival retraction, other specified postsurgical states

Interventions

Procedure/surgery
Other
D01.056.031
Control group: suture group The non-covered palatal wound, after harvesting the graft from the palate, the wound will be left uncovered with an absorbable X-shaped suture, with the intention of healin

Sponsors

Centro de Ciências da Saúde (CCS)
Lead Sponsor
Centro de Estudo e Pesquisa em implantes dentários (CEPID)
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: At least 18 years old- 70 years old; Able to read and understand informed consent document; Patients needing soft tissue graft with teeth that have miller class I or II recession, more equal 2mm, on the facial aspects; Presence of periodontally healthy teeth at the recipient site equal or less than 25 percent plaque index; Ability of the participants to maintain good oral hygiene; Patient not pregnant or breastfeeding; Not taking medications known to cause gingival enlargement;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Smokers/tobacco users; Patients with systemic pathologies or conditions contraindicating oral surgical procedures or adversely affecting wound healing; Patients that have severe gingival recession (Miller class III and IV) or less than 2 mm; Presence of periodontal disease at the recipient site; Poor oral hygiene; Patient pregnant or breastfeeding; Taking medications known to cause gingival enlargement.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Presentation of the expected outcome: Evaluate postoperative pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) method, in periods of 24, 72 hours, 10 and 30 days, presented by numbers from 0 to 10, with 10 being the highest level of pain in the post operative measurements

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Presentation of the expected outcome: Evaluate postoperative healing using the intraoral photography method, in periods of 24, 72 hours, 10 and 30 days, presented by numbers from 0 to 2, where 0 is equal to hemostasis, 1 is equal to repithelization and 2 is equal to keratinization. representing differences in percentages;Presentation of the expected outcome: Assess postoperative bleeding using the options questionnaire method, with or without bleeding, in periods of 24, 72 hours, 10 and 30 days, with two, presented in percentages

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactCesar ;Mario Benfatti;Escobar

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina;Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

cesarbenfatti@yahoo.com;marioescobar23@me.com+55 4899229961;+593980871252

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)