Skip to content

Comparison of High Fidelity Simulator versus Dramatization: impact on satisfaction, self-confidence and knowledge of nursing students

High Fidelity Simulator x Dramatization: impact on satisfaction, self-confidence and knowledge of Nursing students

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4dc5yc
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-02-19
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nursing Students

Interventions

A clinical simulation will be performed on care to the colostomized patient as a teaching strategy for undergraduate students in nursing with the objective of comparing the high fidelity clinical simu
Other
I02.903.847

Sponsors

Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto - USP
Lead Sponsor
Universidade do Oeste Paulista - UNOESTE
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Students regularly enrolled in the 3rd and 4th year of the undergraduate nursing course. Older than 18 years;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Failure to comply with the study steps.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is hoped that nursing students will demonstrate gains in knowledge, satisfaction and self-confidence after high-fidelity clinical simulation. A questionnaire with objective questions will be applied to evaluate the knowledge before and after the clinical simulation (group with simulated patient and another group with the high fidelity simulator). To verify the level of satisfaction and self-confidence will be used an instrument after the clinical simulation. Statistical tests will be applied to verify the increase of the knowledge about intestinal stomas being considered level of significance of 5%.;Knowledge outcome: There was a statistically significant difference when comparing post-test and pre-test knowledge, independent of the group in which the student was enrolled, evidencing knowledge gain. Control Group (Post - test) Value p <0.01 Intervention Group (Post - test) Value p <0.01. When comparing knowledge gain between control group and intervention, no statistically significant results were observed: Pre-test: (Control - Intervention) Value - p- 0.28 Post-test (Control - Intervention) Value p- 0.53.;Outcome Satisfaction and Self-confidence: When comparing the (Control Group - simulated patient) and (Intervention Group - simulator) it was possible to observe that there were no statistically significant differences (p value -0.05) in the results of the scales of the satisfaction and self - confidence scales.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAlessandra Mazzo

Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto - USP

amazzo@eerp.usp.br+55 16 3315-3381

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)