Subacromial impingement syndrome
Conditions
Interventions
The first is performed in supine position progressing during the course of treatment to the sitting position, the patient performs a bilateral anterior flexion movement of shoulders until 60º overcomi
E02.779.474
Sponsors
Universidad de las Americas
CDT Hospital San Borja de Arriaran
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 52 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Subjects between 18 and 52 years old; derived from the Adult Trauma Service with clinical and imaging diagnosis of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (SIS); Volunteers Accepting and signing the informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Individuals with pathologies of cervical origin; proximal humeral fractures; adhesive capsulitis; calcic tendonitis; subjects who have had a history of previous shoulder surgery or treated with corticosteroid infiltration in the affected shoulder in the last 12 months
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected result 1- It is expected to find a improve in shoulder function assessed through the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in the participants of the specific exercise program compared to that of general exercises ;Result found 1- Patients assigned to specific exercises showed an improvement in shoulder function by the end of the fifth week to 34.5 points ( standard deviation= 7.9). The between-group difference in change provided an estimate of the effect of the Specific exercises on shoulder function was 10 points ( 95% Confidence Interval: 4.3 to 15.6; ?2 = 0.22, p = 0.001) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected result 2- It is expected to find a improve in upper limb function assessed through the Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire in the participants of the specific exercise program compared to that of general exercises;Result found 2- Patients assigned to specific exercises showed an improvement in upper limb function by the end of the fifth week to 18 points ( standard deviation= 4.8). The between-group difference in change provided an estimate of the effect of the Specific exercises on upper limb function was 10.4 points,(95% Confidence Interval: 5.6 to 15.2; ?2 = 0.27, p < 0.001);Expected result 3- It is expected to find a decrease in pain intensity (at rest and at movement) assessed through the visual analogue scale in the participants of the specific exercise program compared to that of general exercises;Result found 3-Patients assigned to specific exercises showed an decreased in pain intensity (at rest)by the end of the fifth week to 1.4 cm ( standard deviation= 0.6). The between-group difference in change provided an estimate of the effect of the Specific exercises on pain intensity was 0.2 cm, (?2 = 0.07, p = 0.553). Patients assigned to specific exercises showed an decreased in pain intensity (at movement) by the end of the fifth week to 1.8 cm ( standard deviation= 0.5). The between-group difference in change provided an estimate of the effect of the Specific exercises on pain intensity was 1.7 cm, (?2 = 0.24, p < 0.001);Expected result 4- It is expected to find a decrease in fear of movement assessed through the Tampa kinesiophobia scale in the participants of the specific exercise program compared to that of general exercises;Result found 4- Patients assigned to specific exercises showed an improvement in fear of movement by the end of the fifth week to 27.3 points ( standard deviation= 13.1). The between-group difference in change provided an estimate of the effect of the Specific exercises on fear of movement was 14.3 point | — |
Countries
Chile
Contacts
Public ContactFelipe Araya
Universidad de las Americas
Outcome results
None listed