Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of Composite Resins Tetric N-PowerFill 2 vs. Tetric NCeram 2 in Deciduous Molars: A Clinical Study

Clinical Evaluation of Tetric N-PowerFill 2 vs. Tetric N-Ceram 2 in primary posterior teeth: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded parallel study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4cfz6sp
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-02-05
Start date
2025-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Composite Resins

Interventions

This is a randomized, double-blind (patient and evaluator), parallel, equivalence clinical trial. It will be conducted in the clinics of the Dentistry Program at the State University of Ponta Grossa.

Sponsors

Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
3 Years to 10 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Good general and oral health; no need for endodontic or periodontal treatment; patients between three and ten years old who require a restoration in a primary posterior tooth; any gender

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe systemic diseases; poor oral hygiene; allergy to any components present in the materials used; patients with a high risk of pulp exposure; endodontic complications; chronic use of medications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome of this clinical study is the fracture/retention of the restorations over time. This will be assessed by experienced and calibrated evaluators following FDI criteria. The fracture/retention of the restorations will be compared between the control group and the test group through visual inspection of each restoration

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary outcomes will also be evaluated following FDI criteria, including marginal adaptation, post-operative sensitivity, recurrence of carious lesions, color, surface polish, occlusion and wear, proximal contact (in the case of Class II), anatomical form, and radiographic evaluation, as well as patient satisfaction with the restorative procedure in both groups. These outcomes will also be assessed by experienced and calibrated blinded evaluators through visual and radiographic means

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAna Chibinski

Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa

anachibinski@hotmail.com+55(42)999171983

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)