Skip to content

Effect of clinical reasoning prompts for nursing students

Effect of clinical reasoning prompts on the diagnostic accuracy of baccalaureate nursing students: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-4bhr78
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-07-17
Start date
2018-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate

Interventions

Intervention Group (40 undergraduate nurses from the EPE / UNIFESP and 40 undergraduate nursing students from UFPR): use of the Self-Instructional Guide to Clinical Reasoning (GARC) called Instruction
- At the beginning of the semester following completion of the Nursing courses at the Federal University of Paraná. Pre-test - The prin
Other

Sponsors

Escola Paulista de Enfermagem
Lead Sponsor
Departamento de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Paraná
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Be a student of the baccalaureate course in Nursing; Have completed and have been approved in the subjects of Fundamentals of Nursing Care, Clinical Nursing and Surgical Nursing of EPE / UNIFESP; or have completed the disciplines of Fundamentals of Nursing Care and Nursing in Adult Health and the Elderly of UFPR.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Medical diagnosis of dyslexia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Accuracy in identifying the patient's ND / problem: evaluated through a rubric created based on the Lunney Scoring Method, a semantic differential scale to estimate the accuracy of the NDs, which assigns values from -1 to 5 to the identified diagnoses.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Accuracy of the identification of the appropriate etiologies for the ND / priority patient's problem: evaluated through a rubric created based on the Lunney Scoring Method, a semantic differential scale to estimate the accuracy of the NDs, which assigns values from -1 to 5 to the identified diagnoses.;Number of signs and symptoms that are relevant or defining characteristics that confirm the priority ND/patient problem: evaluated through a rubric created based on the Lunney Scoring Method, a semantic differential scale to estimate the accuracy of the NDs, which assigns values from -1 to 5 to the identified diagnoses.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactCamila Lopes

Escola Paulista de Enfermagem

camilatakao@hotmail.com+55-11-55764430

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026