FindTrial
Sign In

Clinical evaluations of conventional and digital provisional removable partial dentures

Conventional vs. digital provisional removable partial dentures: a randomized controlled crossover clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-48zgwz5
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-02-04
Start date
2024-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Loss

Interventions

This is a randomized controlled crossover clinical trial. A total of 16 partially edentulous patients will be randomly assigned into two groups according to the treatment type: CD-DD (initially rehabi
E06.780.346.760.943.484

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of both sexes; aged 18 or older; partially edentulous; who are interested in participating in the study for the installation of interim removable partial dentures; and who present good general health conditions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with palatal or mandibular torus requiring surgical removal; cognitive disease; communication difficulties and who have trouble attending the university for prosthetic treatment and follow-up appointments; patients with temporomandibular dysfunction

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate fabrication and adjustment times for installation after 3 months of using each type of prosthesis.;To evaluate the presence of soft tissue lesions after 3 months of using each type of prosthesis.;To evaluate the need for repairs after 3 months of using each type of prosthesis.;To evaluate the presence of staining after 3 months of using each type of prosthesis.;To evaluate masticatory performance using the mixing ability method, after 3 months of using each type of prosthesis.;To evaluate the participant's preference regarding the type of prosthesis.;To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the prostheses using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.—

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate patient satisfaction, assessed through a validated questionnaire, after 3 months of using each type of prosthesis.;To evaluate oral health-related quality of life, assessed using the validated OHIP-14 questionnaire, after 3 months of using each type of prosthesis.—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactLucas de Sousa

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

lucascavalcantedesousa@hotmail.com+55 (84) 987532851

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)