Skip to content

Effect of Therapeutic Touch for preventing injuries in the feet of people with diabetes

Effect of Therapeutic Touch for prevention of Diabetic Foot

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-45rdh2
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-02-24
Start date
2014-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes mellitus, Diabetic foot.

Interventions

Will be enrolled in this study 60 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who will be randomly divided into two groups: Group (n = 30) and control group (n = 30). The Treaty Group, with 30 individuals,
Device
Other

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Alfenas
Lead Sponsor
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientítfico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Volunteer with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 diagnosed for at least five years; of both sexes; registered in HIPERDIA; medical care in the unit; over the age of 18 years; have at least one risk factor for impaired skin integrity, according to established nursing diagnosis "risk of impaired skin integrity" (NANDA,2013).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Volunteers with cognitive disabilities; presence of foot ulcers; presence of amputations of the lower limbs; presence of thrombosis; uncontrolled hypertension; in other unconventional treatment modality.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected that there is an improvement in tissue integrity score values of the feet, after treatment by means of a scale that consists of 20 indicators grouped into five constructs: skin and attached, blood circulation, sensitivity, tissue temperature and pressure plant. The scale values are measured on 5-point Likert form where 1 refers to extremely compromised; 2, substantially compromised; 3, moderately compromised; 4, slightly compromised; and 5, not compromised. Thus, the higher the score, the lower the commitment (SILVA et al., 2013);There was improvement in scores related to skin and attachment and sensitivity

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected that there is improvement in the treated group of biological markers related sensitivity (using monofilament test Semmes-Weinstein), temperature plant (through thermal image) plantar pressure (through use of baropodometry) and glucose blood (through the capillary glucose);There was an improvement only in the biological marker of tissue temperature

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactDenise Iunes

Universidade Federal de Alfenas

deniseiunes@unifal-mg.edu.br+55 (35) 32922377

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)