FindTrial
Sign In

Clinical evaluation of restorations performed on tooth and outside the mouth using flexible die technique

Clinical evaluation of direct and semidirect restorations using flexible die technique

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-3z5tbf
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-01-01
Start date
2013-03-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental carie

Interventions

30 volunteers were recruited and presented two posterior teeth with restorative need. This isa splith-mouth study and then each tooth received a treatment according to a randomized list, so the tooth
Procedure/surgery
E06.323.428
D05.750.716.822.730

Sponsors

Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia da Universidade Estadual Paulista de São José dos Campos
Lead Sponsor
Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia da Universidade Estadual Paulista de São José dos Campos
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Class II restorations; oral hygiene properly; absence of parafunctional habits, systemic diseases, periodontal disease, removable protesis involving the tooth studied or antagonist; presence of antagonist tooth and adjacents.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Tooth sensitivity; Allergy to resin based on materials or other materials used in this study; Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Functional properties, evaluated with exploratory probe, periapical radiographic and periodontal probe, with aproximately 90% restoration success after 6, 12 and 24 months after restoration;There was no difference in functional properties evaluated between the studied groups verified with exploratory probe, periapical radiographic and periodontal probe (p value higher than 0.05)—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary expected outcome 1: Esthetics, with photography, clinical spectrophotometer, with only 20% of restorations color change after 6, 12 and 24 months after the restorations;Secondary outcome found 1: There was no difference in esthetics of restorations (p value higher than 0.05);Secondary expected outcome 2: Biological aspects, with vitality test, ask for patient, periodontal probe, with aproximately 95% of success after 6, 12 and 24 months after the restoration;Secondary outcome found 2: There was no difference in biological aspects of restorations (p value higher than 0.05)—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactCarlos Torres

Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia da Universidade Estadual Paulista de São José dos Campos

carlosrgt@gmail.com+55-12-39479376

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)